byron mitchill give joe is best ever shot u could see him it the floor like a sack of **** but is head just clears straight away just some thing your born with great attribute
dawson calzaghe....no matter what happens with jones Joe C I want to see dawson calzaghe....then we will see if calzaghe is truly the best of this era
Exactly. Hopkins has shot up both as a p4p boxer and an ATG, which HAS to make Calzaghe's win look more impressive. Put another way, it's hard to name many boxers that could beat Pavlik; thus it's even harder to name boxers who could realistically beat Hopkins. Calzaghe did it; RJJ has a small chance; that's about it.
How did it feel as you sat down to watch Hopkins v Pavlik, pants around your ankles, box of tissues at your side, preparing for a satisfying masturbation session watching Pavlik knock around an old man for a few rounds before smashing him to the canvas? How did the dawning realisation that everything you believe is wrong feel?
his peak was hidden fighting bums in england so no excuses for joe c not being in his prime...he is in his prime to me right now
no I mean noone wants to hear that he is past his prime when. if, he loses because he looks in his prime to me and 10 years ago he would not fight an american over here so none of this he was faster then ****? faster against who?...I just dont want a setup for failure...so when he loses people can say he wouldhave beat him in his prime when e didnt fight anyone in his prime
How is calzaghe faded? this is the point i was making earlier...if he is faded than it just gives credibility to the argument that he avoided ALL big fights his whole life until he fought lacy, through his whole prime he fought noone..why is that?
To end this ****ing thread, Calzaghe did not beat Pavlik. Nobody has changed **** about there opinion that this ****** does not fight the best out there.
The best out there is a man who got dominated by a fighter Calzaghe beat several months ago:think Interesting theory.