So dela Hoya used lidocaine against hopkins and creatine against Trinidad ...

A-Side Meth.

Make dem mutha ****as bulletproof!

 

okay well Just for laughs then.

 

besides the 2 mentioned, ODLH is hiding something. just sign the waiver if you have nothing to hide. deja vu?:rofl

 

This is a troll thread Kirk. The TS pretty much said he's not putting any logic, thoughts, research and/or facts into this.

It's a troll thread for *******s.

 

"Then, in a bombshell, Hauser implies that Oscar De La Hoya was a juicer and, moreover, had a failed test covered up by the Nevada Boxing Commission. He pleads with De La Hoya to agree to a release of his own Nevada records, a broadside Hauser would not deliver unless he was sure of his info. It’s a dark, sordid tale, and Golden Boy Promotions come off as villains. Any suspicion they about Pacquiao likely derives from their own stables active and persistent usage."

 

What the hell are you talking about......every boxer who has blood drawn for boxing licensing purposes has a confidentiality agreement with the commision.

Every boxer, not just DLH.......
The NSAC does'nt use that blood to test for drugs or PED's.....

From what I've been told, they use that blood to test for diseases, like aids and hepatitis......diseases which could be contagious that they would not grant a fighter a license.

Now, there was a reporter, I forget his name but he's a Pac nutlicker, who criticized and made a claim that if GBP had the right to ask Pac for Olympic style random blood testing......why not DLH revoke the confidentiality part of his physical with the NSAC??????

.....the Pac nutlicking journalist was mixing apples and oranges.

DLH's past bloodwork has nothing to do with currently and randomly testing Pacquiao and Mayweather for PED's.......

.....and quite frankly, I dont even think the NSAC even has DLH's blood in a lab for them to retest.
.....when the FBI asked the NSAC for Mosley's blood after the Balco scandal, the NSAC said it not longer had it in its possesion and that they did'nt keep and file the fighters blood.
......so I dont think there is even a point here from the ******* side to ask DLH to revoke a confidentiality report.

You would think that if DLH tested positive for a banned substance in the past, the NSAC would have released those results like they did when they tested Fernando Vargas when DLH fought him.
.....if DLH has tested positive and they did'nt release that information, shame on the NSAC for not disclosing.

 

they are asking for the result to be released, not the specimen.:nono

 

haunted by the very ghost they created.

 

The need to find out what's causing Void's diarrhea.

 

Who needs facts. As long as we have 5 or more people saying it, together with conjectures and hearsays as supporting documents, it stands and the truth. Hell, even if the supporting documents were rebutted already as long as you make a new thread stating the same it becomes truth again.
*

 

Not to mention that one reporter who happens to have deep ties to Top Rank wrote about it!

I mean it's like...practically a fact!

 

and it goes around....crackhead said it and its a fact.

 

Hypocrisy, no surprise there.