so does anyone else feel Khan's 'defeat' at the hands of peterson is wiped off?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by big_AL, May 10, 2012.


  1. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    he won that fight anyway. dc screwed him
     
  2. Finesse74

    Finesse74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,016
    1
    Jul 28, 2010
    I feel like Peterson most def cheated in their first fight. I'm watching the fight as im writing and I have never seen Peterson so aggressive.

    I voted NO. I think it should be a NO CONTEST.
     
  3. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,956
    27,915
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yep...

    I'm a big Khan fan and know he could have fought better
    I was happy for Lamont he seemed like such a nice guy

    Can't believe it really Lamont really messed up big time...

    If only He could have pulled the same performance without PEDS...or could he?
     
  4. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    8,666
    7
    Nov 19, 2008

    if its a no contest then the loss is wiped off
     
  5. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    :rofl:rofl
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    No, I don't think so.

    The amount of drugs Peterson had in his body would not enhance his performance. Unless there is some other evidence out there to prove the drugs would help, I'm not convinced. I thought Peterson outfought Khan and if they fight again, no matter who wins, it'll be a tough, close fight.
     
  7. Mr. Minmon

    Mr. Minmon Member Full Member

    478
    1
    Apr 27, 2012
    Yes. I believe that what Peterson had in his system that night helped give him an illegal edge (especially when it came to important factors such as his strength, endurance and stamina... however slight an advantage it may have been it was still an illegal one).

    It was also a close, contested fight that could have gone either way, and when you take into account Peterson's drug use a new decision should be rendered.
     
  8. Maximus

    Maximus TKO6 Full Member

    3,787
    1,508
    Apr 29, 2011
    We are supposed to assume the only drugs he got caught for were the only drugs he was using? Besides, he was nearly 4 times over the 'normal' amount of testosterone and coincidentally just under the limit that normal testing would have picked up, and why is a doctor treating a low testosterone patient with medication that takes him way above the normal limit?. He's a cheating **** whichever way you look at it.
     
  9. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    They can't over turn that loss bc Peterson didn't fail a drug test. He could sue over that **** but that would be stupid. Now if they do over turn it then Oscar needs his loss to Mosley over turned bc Mosley was on something but didn't fail the post fight **** test.
     
  10. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,293
    10,879
    Jun 5, 2010
    I'm waiting for the full story to be revealed. If without a doubt
    Peterson wasn't on the up and up (not jumping to conclusions and
    filling in the blanks), then Amir Khan definately needs to have the
    loss wiped from his record. Lets see where the chips fall first.
     
  11. anundecidedarm

    anundecidedarm Active Member Full Member

    812
    0
    Oct 23, 2011
    I never thought Amir lost to Peterson. However, I did give props to Peterson for "beating" him. But now, I give him absolutely no props. It was quite saddening hearing the news that Peterson is a cheater.