So, Floyd Fans: Who Do You Have Beating Floyd at Welter in Boxing History

coward??? Your ****ly hero is a yellow belly coward, whats that say about you.:deal

 

Like YOU know it? atschYou're a friggin joke son. Everyone knows it. And you're wrong so often it's almost expected.

All you did was post a little vid. Didn't prove that Floyd would walk down Whitaker you *******.

Wait...did you think you won something? :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

My hero? :rofl

Floyd is a boxer, in one of the most dangerous sports in the world. There is no such thing as coward in boxing, especially when Floyds fought 18 top 10 titlests and the most championship fights of anyone in the pound for pound top 10.

What has your bitchass ever done? Besides disgrace the sport of boxing by even claiming to be a fan?

 

you aint a fan of boxing, youre a fan of a coward. .. must mean you value that trait. :good

 

Again why are you wasting my time if you arent even trying to debate any of the points. You are the joke, what are you even doing on these site? You bring up no great incite, no fight analysis, you just follow Floyd fans like a little whiny *****. Like a poodle nipping at your ankles.

My vid showed Floyd walking down a Zab Judah who he didnt respect in power. Something he has done before.

Either debate or slink off like the hoe you are.

 

Very true. However that just might be an overall decline in skill level, thus the division is dominated by only the most physically imposing Heavyweights like Klitschko.

How do you think Haye will fair? He seems to be somewhat the form of the old heavies?

 

We were talking about Whitaker, whom you said Floyd would walk down...and you show Floyd going foward with Zab?

Yeah...you're REALLY good at debates.:roll:

 

Just some quick points.

- Judah ain't Pernell Whitaker

- Judah is weak to pressure, Whitaker was great against pressure

- Chavez, Ramirez, and Nelson all had to respect Pernell, what makes Floyd any different? If he tried to walk him down, he'd get picked off. Pernell's ability off the backfoot negates Floyd's pressure.

 

Judah aint no Whittaker. But an old Chavez, Ramirez and a smaller Azuma Nelson aint no Floyd either.

Zab has the quickest hands in boxing, and Floyd was able to slip and pick off many punches coming in. Of course Pea wouldnt fold like Zab did, but I think Floyd matches Pea in all areas and bests him in power and thats why he'd win this fight.

 

Fair enough. We'll agree to disagree. I can't deal with typing anymore.

Have a good one.

 

Lol. Its an example you buffoon. What the **** is there to debate when you cant use examples to showcase your argument. :rofl Floyd walking down a quick slick boxer, probably the quickest boxer today. Its an example, im not saying Judah is Pea, but stressing what Floyds gameplan might be.


City college eh? :good GED maybe?

 

Jesus...what you think is a smart post is just more garbarge. atsch WTF does Chavez or Nelson even have to do with Whitaker - Mayweather and Mayweather supposedly WALKING him down. You just do NOT know how to post on a message board.

You break down a fight like a video game, which is probably mpore your area of expertise. As if just saying who has better speed or power means anything. You're just a simple minded little boy.

 

Judah is probably the slickest boxer today? :roll: Just keep diggin that whole deeper...

 

He fought Corrales off the backfoot all night you ******.

 

I just think that the total output of strenght and resistance is generally higher nowadays than 50 + years ago and that's essentially why today's elite would have the upper hand. If this statement is valid for every other sport, then it's reasonable to think the same of boxing.

Another indication that boxing is more demanding physically nowadays (given that boxers have developed greater dynamic strenght as they went) is it would be unthinkable for boxers today to fight once sometimes twice a month for 15 years like Sugar Ray Robinson did. If boxers can't do it anymore it's not because we have genetically evolved into stamina-deprived creatures but because todays boxers are pushing, bumping and to some extent punching each other harder than they used to.

That being said, the above statements don't make the past greats any less greater and boxing any less enjoyable to watch. BTW, I'm one to say that SRR is the GAT.

p.s. Your point on HW's is valid. There's a point, I believe, that too much static strength and too little dynamic strenght (which characterizes a whole bunch of HW's) can be counterproductive.

Not rejecting also the possibility that some generations of boxers are relatively better than others...