So honestly who wins wlad of today or tyson from 86 to 91...minus buster???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Jun 22, 2009.


  1. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    I agree, Tyson is just all wrong for Wlad. Tyson has all the attributes needed to beat Wlad, at almost any stage in his career.

    If you followed Wlad's career as closely as I have, you will notice a trend. Every heavy hitter who threw caution to the wind and went after Wlad, ended up having success against Wlad. TOS, Brewster, Peter, and Sanders. None of these guys had anything close to what Tyson had, even Tyson of 02 was more of fighter than any of those 4 were in their respective primes.

    Tyson of 2000 was highly aggressive and vicious in the ring. He broke Golota's jaw in several places, hence the reason why he kept spitting the mouth piece out when Duva kept trying to put it in. The same Tyson that attempted to break Botha's arm in the clinch, or the one that kept punching Saverese after the ref waved him arms to call an end to the fight, and we cant forget the Orlin Norris fight were he landed one hook after the bell that knocked him the **** out. Wlad cant handle a rough fight, we seen how he panics under tough situations, Tyson would smell fear and would end Wlad quickly.