So If Adamek's Too Small For Vitali, What Does That Make Byrd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Sep 5, 2011.

  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,650
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Spinks was a former 175 pound fighter who was years past his best as well. You want to talk about Adamek's (lack of) impressive performances, how about Spinx about beating up a coked up Cooney and Steffen (Who?) Tangstad ? :lol:

    Again, Holyfield was against a former 190 pounder against a much naturally larger man. He was roided up, not naturally the same size as Tyson
     
  2. yakluvich

    yakluvich Guest

    prime byrd would beat adamek
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    51,943
    Likes Received:
    2
    Forming an analysis based on what others did to others is mistake #1 in boxing...
     
  4. Blake Rayne

    Blake Rayne Fat Cuban Aficianado Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,373
    Likes Received:
    11
    Props to Hendo. After the Haye Wlad fight he as one of the first people to compliment Wlad on his speed/defensive head movement etc.
     
  5. awesome1612

    awesome1612 Guest

    No, it's not irrelevant. Vitali was injured. If you think that he had problems against Byrd you're just a moron and don't understand Vitali's skills. Your rational is just awful, your basing a win off a self inflicted injury to say that another fighter will win. How does that make sense? Also, Wladimir, the worse of the brothers, destroyed Byrd twice. Finally, Vitali was winning the fight. No other rational explanation points to Byrd ever winning if Vitali was uninjured.
     
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,650
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    In this post - more assumptions

    "Wladimir isn't as good as Vitali"

    In this post -

    Thinking Wladimir beating Byrd has anything to do with Vitali LOSING to Byrd"
     
  7. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    12,797
    Likes Received:
    11
    Here he is during his Kickboxing career at age 21/22. I'm not sure his weight for this fight but i'm pretty sure he used to fight at 205.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTYjTvwOC6M[/ame]
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,650
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Vitali also doesn't like it to the body. Byrd showed that. :deal
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,646
    Byrd wins 1 out of 100 against vitali and that night just so happened to be that one.
     
  10. Schuden

    Schuden Guest

    LOL, Vitali looks like a cruiserweight. He obviously worked his way up.
     
  11. Schuden

    Schuden Guest

    Why did he get injured?
     
  12. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,709
    Likes Received:
    2
    the injury wasnt inflicted by byrd, it was an internal injury. Byrd lost very nearly every round, its not the same as the lennox fight where vitali was marginally ahead when the fight was stopped due to the damage inflicted by lewis.
     
  13. Schuden

    Schuden Guest

    What caused the injury?
     
  14. Pirao

    Pirao Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why don't you answer the question then, oh you medical specialist? Are you suggesting Byrd had anything to do with the injury? :deal
     
  15. canis-lupus

    canis-lupus Guest

    Nah, Vitali was injured with is arms badly thats why he lost. Later he would knocked Byrd out