So is it general consensus now that Mayweather ducked Pacquiao?

That's right those people have their own agenda, and so are you.

 

General consensus in many ways is important. For money, reputation, and for comort in some of the decisions we make.

But that doesn't make a general consensus true. General consesus has been gained threw agenda's and propaganda to do some horrible things.

It is my opinion which i believe to be fact that a general consensus is not true all the time. I would guess that you believe general consensus was always true but that seems very foolish to believe that you would believe that.

 

what u said is true, no arguments. when it comes to opinions, its just a discussion between some people across the internet.

what really is important tho is the consensus so that shuold be more of a talking point. the best thing for floyd though about all of this is that, if you are right and the consensus is wrong, then he has time to change the whole consensus with one phone call. he could do it quicker than i could write this out if he wanted. itd take him 2, maybe 3 minutes tops. lets see what he does eh?

 

If you can't find him saying he agreed then it's a lie. Because it would be somewhere. By him saying all demands was just a play on words. I searched it and didn't find it and nobody has found it because it never happened.

FYI, I looked at the info and as soon as I couldn't find it from anywhere I deemed it not true on the basis that it would be somewhere quoted by someone on pac's side. That is all I did to come to that conclusion. What is wrong with my thinking on that? Do you look into things or just take them?

And Yes I feel pac's side would have been screaming that they agreed to full random blood testing directly if it were true.

 

Again let me state what I'm implying, it's opinion, yours and others. I never said I believe on general consensus always, it's a case to case basis. You're right that you have to study it first to make a decision if you agree with it or not. Sometimes people tend to believe it if it agrees to their agendas, if not they don't believe it, and that my friend is a fact.

 

That would require floyd dropping the blood test requirements. I don't know if he will and I feel that pac will eventually give in. If he does drop it then that looks very stupid seeing we could have had this back in march without all this testing ****.

 

You are right about that and I totally agree. Just remember it when looking at all situations. What happened, happened and we can only draw off of that. When something is said, I make sure I find out if it happened.

I just do not work like as I have to confirm what happens and put it into the over all scheme of things. I also try to challenge on a point to point basis after I have looked at it, No matter who is involved. Like I said, I jumped the gun on floyd when ESPN said that pac agreed to all demands and started bashing him for putting himself above guys like leonard and sweat pea who faught everyone. When I looked for it I found it to not be true and a play on words i recanted. I challenge anyone to find a quote anywhere saying they agreed to the blood testing up to 48hours prior to the fight. I will win garenteed.

IF IT THEY DID COME OUT AND SAY THAT THEY AGREED TO THE 48 HOUR CUT OFF, THEN I WOULD BE CALLIN FLOYD OUT FOR DUCKING.

Seeing all that has happened, I don't feel the vacation or the not thinking bout boxing is really anything special seeing what has happened in the timeline of this. That is just my opinion.

As for why pac did this and floyd did that. This whole mess has been riddle with idiotic, and illogical decisions by both sides.

 

That my friend is a fact