He let brook get the shots in simply because he was not worried about the power when me and my 7 year old son have a little boxing spar i let him hit me his hardest and hit me often does that mean he exposed me or is it because i wanted that to happen?
okay so you just compared the GGG vs Kell Brook fight to you and your 7 year old son having a spar. seriously...
Thinking back, when has Golovkin ever fought anybody that was truly adept with the uppercut? Chalk it up to a new experience...and now that he's past it (and presumably will continue working on defense against uppers in training as part of his ongoing learning curve, even in his mid-thirties) he'll be even more dangerous as that's one more door that will slowly be shut to his opponents going forward.
Someone said that everything that happened in the fight happened because GGG wanted it. That is correct assesment. Because of the s hit layout of this forum nowadays I was not able to quote it. Put Kell Brooke against Canelo at 154 and let's see who wins lol. If someone can recomend me a proper forum for proper boxing discussion, please send a pm
I was glad to see what Brook could do, being less familiar with him. But- IMO Golovkin looked like he had picked up a virus or similar. He was shiny-eyed and looked really inconsistent physically. My guess, if he was sick- he will destroy whoever he fights next. He knows he did not fight well.
Hahahaha Why didnt u use the real face to face photo ? And yea of course " boy" Kell Brook stood no chance. NO ONE 160 AND BELOW STANDS A CHANCE , the power is real YEA THAT MEANS FLOYD TOO
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pc0pDANxy_I/maxresdefault.jpg Look at their shoulders, and GGG is slouching abit...Happy?
I don't even know if there's a blueprint. More just that Golovkin's aura of invincibility has taken a hit. That's still a far cry from Brook having paved the way for any Tom, Dick or Harry to step in and defeat Golovkin by stepping in Brook's tracks.
He did let brook hit him even said to him come hit him more he did not do that for stevens and lemieux