So Manny Pacquiao won't take risk...tell me when has he ever taken one?

Appeal to Authority is a non-argument.
so is Appeal to numbers
but let's entertain that a bit. i.e. Spanish and German sports commentators really thought Pac won, and Fluid was gifted the win. Are they right?
How do you prove they're wrong?
simple .. study the fight closely and carefully..

but that proves they're right.

 

Op dksab

 

This, in a nutshell :good

 

Actually Pac's career is all smoke and mirrors, just like Floyd's. But Pac did take a few more risks. Barrera and Morales were risky fights - hence he lost to Morales.

 

He was a bigger underdog to Ledwaba than Ali was to Liston or Foreman.

 

Appeal to nuthugging is not an argument. MOST everyone though Floyd won easily. Even the Pac fans until the shoulder injury which was healed by swimming in the salt ocean, then slow motion, then IV, then USADA is owned by Floyd, then NSAC is owned by Floyd, then Vegas is owned by Floyd, then nobody wanted to inflame race wars ... so much BS excuses.

Floyd proved he's better than Pac. Pac didn't even do as well as Maidana for gosh sakes /thread