So now Ward and Kessler are locks for the semis, who will be the other 2?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boom_Boom, Jun 20, 2010.


  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Ward 4pts
    Kessler 4 pts (Alen Queen is 2 free points minimum)

    So that leaves it at.

    Abraham 3pts
    Dirrell 2 pts
    Froch 2 pts

    Dirrell needs to win against Ward for him to go to semis and the winner of Abe/Froch joins him. A Dirrell lose and both Abraham and Froch move on despite who wins in their match.

    So who will the other 2 be?
     
  2. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    i thought kess had 2 points. Ward has 4, aa has 3
     
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    yes, but who in their right mind would pick Green against Kessler...

    he is a lock
     
  4. Fullhouse

    Fullhouse Active Member Full Member

    866
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Kessler wins against Green, Dirrell loses to Ward in Oakland and Abraham knocks Froch out.

    So AA and Froch are in the Semis:

    AA - Kessler
    Ward - Froch
     
  5. Fullhouse

    Fullhouse Active Member Full Member

    866
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    If AA knocks out Froch and Ward decisions Dirrell, both will have 6 points. I think Ward will be on top of the table then, because he has one more W?
     
  6. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    Kess v Green looks easy and should be but we have to wait until the fight is over.Id like to see Abraham and Froch go forward but think it will probably be Abraham and Direll.
     
  7. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    Don't count Green out - look how Ward looked against Kessler and then how Kessler did with Froch.

    Green ain't elite, no, but he's a solid fighter and someone like Kessler suits him FAR more than Ward. Kessler winning against Green ain't a lock.
     
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Idiot.
     
  9. slo100

    slo100 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,712
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
    I see Kessler stopping Green.
     
  10. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    That rely's on both Dirrell and AA winning.

    I can't see that happening.

    Will be well worh a bet on the double though, if that is what you fancy odds should be fairly decent.
     
  11. JustinD

    JustinD Member Full Member

    453
    0
    Mar 21, 2007
    No way Green beats Kessler.
     
  12. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    I would agree with that.

    Also Kessler still looked like he had faded to me. It was just a case that Froch didn't step it up. Green will have more chances to hit Kessler but Kessler has a great chin. I think Kessler is a big favourite but I wouldn't rule green out.
     
  13. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    I've seen your posts littered around the site and I have much the same to say about you. In fact, your posts have to be some of the most simple and asinine pieces of **** I read on here.

    How long have you been watching boxing?
     
  14. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    GTFO my thread noob and dont click on my threads next time.

    You could be 50+ years old and watch more boxing than me but that doesnt change the fact that you're still an Idiot.

    The fact that you visited this thread atleast twice and didnt vote tells me you think Green is likely to move on to the semis.
     
  15. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    See, again, there's no logic in that statement at all. Do you actually mean to type this kind of ****? I mean seriously, do you actually think that's genuinely true? What a ********.

    The logic in my first post is compeltely sound and you're a ****ing cretin if you can't grasp simple things like that. i'm not gonna even bother explaining it to you, I can tell by your posts you won't be able to grasp basic concepts and ideas.

    Now run along, i'm sure you allotted computer time is up.