So, Sky were right then?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by GuyIncognito76, Oct 14, 2012.


  1. GuyIncognito76

    GuyIncognito76 New Member Full Member

    79
    0
    Sep 30, 2009
    Re: Maloney/Price deal.

    Weak undercard, terrible main event. Soon to be repeated with Matt Skelton.

    Price needs to get off the wastelands and obscurity of the two Franks.
     
  2. punchdrunkgench

    punchdrunkgench Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,082
    2
    Mar 19, 2009
    yeah sky are spot on, they have neither of the 2 most promising exciting and biggest draw heavyweights for the past 10 years but they have prizefighter,,,,,, pure genius NOT
     
  3. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    The undercard was stacked with good fights..
     
  4. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    I thought it was all right as a card - the supports were better than the main, but I knew that going in.
     
  5. kobashi

    kobashi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,533
    811
    Jan 2, 2010
    I think Sky would love David Price on board. They just dont want all the other weak shows Maloney promotes.
     
  6. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    The undercard was very solid, obviously the CW title fight was ****, but the British CW division is nothing short of disgraceful, so not much to be expected to begin with
     
  7. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011

    That's the thing, telling someone: "We want your fighter but we don't want you promoting", is liable to **** people off! And so BoxNation have him. When Price steps up to euro or world level then it's going to be good fights.
     
  8. BrummyLad

    BrummyLad Sergio Kun Aguero Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    :rofl

    Get the **** outta here. This card was 10x the card of what's normally served by Hennessey and Fish eyes. It was a decent card on paper and had a few intriguing fights. Maloney is on his last hand before folding his lot and taking his chips yet last night was decent. Don't go buying £75 tickets for Haye v Chisora ;)
     
  9. gashalasha7

    gashalasha7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,036
    1
    Dec 14, 2010
  10. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    Are you kidding me? There was some good undercard fights, i enjoyed it.
     
  11. joegrundy

    joegrundy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    undercard was great, **** thread.
     
  12. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Was a decent card for once, Frank normally serves up dross but Anwar fight and Satchell was ok. Problem is his stable isn't stacked and he's not the best at serving up quality cards on a regular so Sky did right IMO.
     
  13. DUNNERS_2009

    DUNNERS_2009 Active Member Full Member

    554
    0
    Apr 1, 2009
    Was a good card from top to bottom on paper 3 good 12 round fights on paper (fly, cruiser and light welter eliminator) and a Heavyweight fight that could have finished at any time plus the usual prospects etc.
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    The card was Sky quality. BN just need to improve on their production and the flow of the event because it just feels long, boring and dragged out. It needs to be more intro, fight, interview, next fight.