So the WBC does not accept David Haye

Everyone on here knows Haye will put that fool out of his misery!

No need trying to act as if we are still in the days of fighters having to earn title shots. And some of you ***gits are downright disgraceful, petty, and jealous; worrying about what kind of payday another man is going to receive.

 

Haye already earned it by unifying Cruiser, taking SNV's title, then taking Wlad the full 12, and brings more money to Vitali than any other fighter. No other active fighter in the division has achieved more in their career bar Wlad, the universally recognized No 1. Vitali gets a pass for having an AWFUL resume since he came out of retirement, it's like a who's who of novices, bums, has-beens and Cruisers that Wlad couldn't be bothered to fight. Only the most blatant Klit-**** could claim that Chisora, Adamek or Solis earned their shot so why start arguing about Haye? Why would you want to see Vitali fight another no-name no-hope?

 

Chisora was out of shape weighing 262 pounds vs Fury and anybody with a f4cking brain knows Chisora clearly dominated Helenius in which the wbc saw it.

 

Haye hasnt earn anything. He disappoint many ppl with his lies saying he will save heavyweight boxing by koing Wlad. He says he'll bring back excitement. <<<Where was all of that? Exactly. Chisora earn his shot by clearly beating Helenius in a dominate fashion in which everyone who saw that fight knows it was true.

 

So what? Wlad promised he'd knock Haye out in brutal fashion but you don't call him on his bull****. It's called hyping a fight, and Haye is probably the best in the division at it. He was half right anyway, the HW division DOES need saving and I don't want to **** on your parade but Chisora is pretty much the definition of not earning a shot, going back to when Wlad decided to not fight him (twice). Klit-tards are a ****ing blight on these forums.

 

What is with Klit-tards and their excuses. Not enough that you make up excuses for the sisters losses, then we get excuses for their one-armed wins, now we have excuses for their opponents losses too (when it suits them of course)? How come Chisora is allowed to come in overweight and be excused but Haye is not allowed to break his toe and have 17 stone leaning on him?

 

**** off. Chisora's performance against Helenius is still better than I've ever seen David ****ing Haye fight. He's not a credible contender.

 

Credible like who? 'rocked by a jab' Adamek? 'glass knee novice' Solis? 'lost 2 in his last 3' Chisora? Haye is no less credible than any opponent Vitali has faced since he unretired. Now I just need some photoshop expert to make me a 'Klitschko-land, where going 12 with Helennius is better than going 12 with Wlad' pic. ****s sake, do you people even bother to read what you write?

 

Fie fi fo grunt
I smell a fat, wet, nasty ****

 

I would actually like to see both brothers get defeated. Imagine watching them forced to fight their way back to the top. Imagine some of the current contenders being forced to fight one of the brothers because it was his mandatory.(That was not worded very well but I'm guessing you get the point)

 

LOL @ the Mexican Boxing Council pretending that they have standards.

 

why would they have to fight their way back? They'd still or should be rated higher then the next ranked guy in org if a lose ever was to happen. **** the people they beat down barley lose a placement because no one thought they could win. And working their way back would just be a rematch against someone they already whopped. Although seeing how these top rated guys despise facing any other rated challengers , it would have to be against journeymen

Examples Adamek,Haye,Chagaev, and Chambers were all still rated around #2 or 3 after their loses, which was where they were before the fights took place

 

haye is retired. thus he isnt ranked