So then what would be a fair split for Haye vs Wlad??

I like Haye more and pretty much hate Wlad but 60-40 is only fair. Haye outside of the UK isnt a draw while Klitschko is a draw in many european countries and even though the US hasnt aired his last fight Klitschko is known in the US while Haye on the other hand has only had 1 fight on US TV and that was 2 years ago vs Enzo Mac at Cruiser.

Haye better settle for 60/40 and not use it as an excuse to ***** out.

 

60/40 for Wlad, win or lose. He's earned it.

 

Pretty much anyone with common sense who lives outside the UK can see this.

From saviour to just settling for making money...and his fans accept this ****.Cut the BS and ****in' fight!

 

You're not getting this are you.

Haye could fight Wlad and most likely lose, his stock goes down, where does he go from there considering he has 4-5 fights left in him.

Haye could earn more in his next two fights at a far lesser risk, with better chance of keeping his title thus earning himself more down the line.

Better?

 

If there were only 1 belt then Haye would be the challenger. 60-40 to Wlad is fair

 

Only a dummy would think Haye is a "legit" champion. Haye is a paper champion in which that belt should have been given to Wlad since he beat the real champion Chagaev.

 

If he were to "earn more down the road" he would have to fight a much better level of opposition then he has fought and thus risking losing. So he loses his belt and his pay day and his stock goes down a whole lot more then it would if he had lost to the #1 guy in the division.

 

Wlad is known from around the world. Wlad been on many usa tv fights while Haye never been one, well maybe 1 but that's it. People keep talking about Haye draw in the uk but in all honestly who doesn't draw in the uk if the uk fighters mostly fights there? lol. But outside of the uk, Haye is not well known at all but he deserves 50/50 split? I swear many here that thinks it should be 50/50 should watch other sports.

 

And does he by himself bring in PPV, the main drive in any boxing negotiation, from around the world?

Does he have a major deal with a US network?

No, and neither does Haye atm.
But combined I'd bet they'd do numbers in the USA that they couldn't do without the other.

 

Dude, Haye outside the uk isn't well known point blank. <<<You can't change the facts. Look at Mayweather vs Hatton for example, Hatton draws better then Haye in the uk but he didn't get 50/50 with Floyd now did he? But Haye who isn't a bigger draw then Hatton deserves a 50/50 split with Wlad cause Haye sells uk ppv? You can't get a 50 percent of the split if you're not well known outside of your country and is holding a paper title.

 

Wether Haye is known outside of the UK or not is irrelivant.
Wlad can be known by every single Person in the world for all I care but if they ain't buying his fights it doesn't matter squat.

Again I say without figures arguing is pointless.
How much did Wlad earn vs Chambers?
What did it bring in total compared to Haye - Ruiz?

In order to debate what % Haye is entitled to we need to know what each man brings financially to the table.

Unless we have actual hard figures debating is pointless.

 

Haye is a big fish in a small pond in terms of worldwide appeal.He is fortunate to receive 40%,if that is offered.The UK does not earn more revenue than Germany and the US.

 

Wlad earns in the US?

How much did Wlad earn from the US for his fight with Chambers?

 

Wlad sells out in germany, usa (msg), been on many usa tv fights while Haye either never been on any usa tv or 1 time. If you're not well known to the public out of the uk then YOU AIN'T DESERVING A 50 PERCENT OF THE SPLIT!!!!!!! Damn man my goodness.

 

^^^Also Wlad holds the ibf/wbo,ibo (ring magazine) while Haye holds a paper title that should been given to Wlad since Wlad beat "the" real champion Chagaev.