So this is the guy you're so sure would have beaten fury?

Lennox was ultra cautious against big punchers. Against guys he didn't see as a threat he went right at them. Fury isn't a threat he has zero power. None.

Vitali Klitschko was a much better puncher than Fury. Vitali also had an Iron Chin. Fury has none of these things except for the height and an awkward style (Vitali was more awkward)

 

So who has vitali ko’d clean? Seriously? It’s all tkos and ref stoppages. Just like fury. He hit sanders about 1000 times, sosnowski 2000 and Briggs 3000.

vitali better chin, but fury has the bigger heart as he would never of quit v Byrd and his cut against walllin was similar.

In what way is vitali more skilled than fury? What aspects separate him clearly from fury.

 

Very cringe worthy thread!!

 

Little to none.

 

don’t read it then and take it so serious.

I have lennox beating fury until proven otherwise aka beating aj and Usyk

 

He got beat by John McDermott in their first fight. Big John may not have got the decision but, the general consensus is that Fury lost. Does that mean that McDermott is a H2H top 10 Heavyweight?

Of course not. Putting those LL losses into the correct context, it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that Lewis took both fights far too lightly, didn't prepare and lacked dedication in camp. In the rematches, he destroyed Rahman in brutal fashion and had McCall sobbing like a little girl after boxing his ears off.

Tyson Fury beats a titleist in Wilder, not an ATG and a past prime WK who at the time was going through well documented personal problems with his wife on suicide watch due to severe post natal depression, and all of a sudden, Tyson Fury easily defeats a consensus top 10 ATG and H2H monster who defeated every man he ever faced and who's resume shats all over Tyson Furys. Do me a favour and GTFOH with all that BOLLOCKS!

 

Every fighter has a points gift. Fury won v John D. Just like lennox got the luck v mercer.

fury hasn’t been kod

to say fury wouldn’t trouble lennox and it’d be a cake walk is just nonsense. You know it, i know it , the world knows it

 

I don't take it serious. I take very few posters on this board serious. Fury has a long ways to go to match LL. And H2H, that's Lewis as well.

 

I usually agree with your posts but, you could bracket the opponents on the resumes similarly of every boxer who ever lived. In the grand scheme of things, Lennox Lewis's resume is an excellent one.

 

what did I say. I still favour lennox at the moment and he’s H2H no1 for me prime for prime.

but to say fury wouldn’t trouble lennox at all is complete fiction, and another example of a poster that cannot be objective in his views

 

Why are you even asking me these? I didn't suggest Fury could not trouble Lewis at all. WTF??!

 

Where exactly did I state that Lennox even beats Fury? The point I was making was that Fury is being massively overrated now where as Lennox Lewis is proven. There are plenty of highlight reel videos of Lennox Lewis and Tyson Fury. Watch them and then tell me that you can honestly say that one fighter defeats the other with any degree of certainty.

 

He just accused me of saying Fury woudn't trouble Lewis.. which was no where CLOSE to anything from me.... That's Eggman for ya...

 

‘Oh very cringe worthy reading’

do you literally just come on here to moan. Why’s it cringey then?

 

Most of Fury's "KO's" are British stoppages. Vitali didn't need those. Nobody said anything about skills. Vitali was a better puncher than Fury, he had a better Chin than Fury and yes while Fury is awkward Vitali was very awkward with that lean back style he had that made him very hard to hit. For example, those knockdowns Wilder scored against Fury would have never happened to Vitali. Nobody is trying to say Vitali was a skilled fighter he benefited from his height, Iron Chin, stamina, and very awkward/bizarre lean back style.