So what was your stance on the olympic style testing before all this mess!!

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

The point i'm trying to make is that these commisions need to have yearly discussions about developing the best anti-doping tests on a constant basis. Whatever it takes, Blood, ****, hair, ect... They need to get with scientist and constantly develope new updated methods.

 

Im sure that was the reason,he was going to go there to fight not go on a vacation.

these sheeps crack me up.

 

Always thought the olympics are dirty as sin. So many atheltes taking PEDs - look how many get caught, I wonder how many get away.

 

:rasta

 

Before the civil war there was slavery pal. Should have left things how they where right. Change is always happening

 

I surmised that all on my own. I did this by viewing the stadium and the surrounding area online by satellite. I then did a search for night life reviews. It just doesn't make sense. Now if there was a Hispanic/Southern component? Great choice.

I have stepped away from the name calling. If you disagree, that is cool. I came to this conclusion on my own as Team Mayweather has never even mentioned why they turned down Dallas stadium in the press to my knowledge.

 

you think slavery is gone?????

 

If you listened to that NSAC interview with Kizer, you'd know that they already follow the highest standards available which is Wada. The way Wada is setup is to save these organizations from wasting valuable resources on things like the complexities of doping by just adopting Wada policy.

Why does NSAC have to hire mass doctors when it can just follow what the fat lady says? It's wasteful to expect Boxing, or the NFL, or MLB to pave new paths to start new fights in the anti-doping world when they can just accept the clearly provided and established standards by Wada.

I bet you didn't know that Wada doesn't use hair as a standard because there are legalities that exist with it. However, the LLND and AFLD, the french anti-doping agencies use hair because it is legal in France.

Regardless, following Wada protocol and standards is the best policy. Think about it.

 

Where am I sayin I'm an expert? or that I'm a scientist? I'm simply saying that the boxing commisions should be constantly be updating their testing methods. I don't care what Arum or Schaffer say.

Is it really that bad for the sport of boxing to want strickter testing?

 

Fair enough,I mentioned it cause i remember Arum being pissed with the fraud camp for turning down the Dallas Cowboy stadium as a possible location for the fight.

Now i dont know if it was cause of the stuff he takes for his hands that is illegal in texas that they refused that location,i was just putting that out there as a possibility.

 

this is not right. are we saying this is a one time deal here?? if this isnt the standard from here on out for all fights, then it shouldnt be acceptable now. if we say its only acceptable now (because of pacs accomplishments), but its never gonna be the standard 4 any other fights, then thats a double standard and "COULD BE" interpreted as unfair treatment toward pacquiao. but if it is gonna be the standard in the future, than thats a different story....and it most likely wont be interpreted as unfair or discrimination. whatever is done, it has to be done all across the board or not done at all. thats fair.:bbb

 

I knew that wada didn't use hair folicles, but wasn't aware for their reasoning behind it.

Have the French agencies had more success in catching dopers through Hair vs Blood or urine? or not much of a differance?