So what's NSAC/USADA/Floyd's response yet to Hauser's 2nd article?

There really isn't very much they can respond to. Hauser mostly responds by pointing out how they either didn't actually contradict, or even mirrored what he said without refuting him, and then also pointing out where they had erred.

I think any reasonable person now (unfortunately) understands that the likelihood is Floyd cheating several times. I hate to think that actually.

 

Why would anyone answer to a ****ing reporter?
Reporters can insinuate to anything that they want, it is up to the public to run with it or not.
I don't see this going anywhere because too much money is involved for too many high ranking people to let a sports reporter dismantle it with something he can't prove.

 

It's hard to come up with a decent response now, because then they are expected to explain why they went against their own ruleset and why?!
This probably would have had less of a backlash for themselves if they did just admit they went against their rules and had given some sort of explanation why. Like "we know, but we made a judgement call in this case because...."
With all the twisting and turning they only fed the suspicions of corruption, incompetence, neglecting their duties or even being in league with Floyd.

 

Spot on. Floyd isn't even countering him because Hauser just pointed out a series of facts.

Floyd's probably been cheating since after the Oscar payday. He bought USADA and that was that.

 

They probably didn't even see his response, and regardless, it won't change anyone's mind who's already made up. Someone will post on here and say "USADA/Floyd needs to respond, their silence is admission of guilt." But the minute they respond, they'll say "they're lying". Going back and forth between them is pointless and only draws negative attention that USADA doesn't want. Whoever thinks Floyd is juicing will continue to think so regardless what they say. And whoever thinks Floyd is clean will continue to think so regardless what Hauser says.

All these discussions and responses between the two is just ammo for the hungry fans desperate for something to attack.

 

Floyd's response always goes something like this :

[yt]-C3k5zQHem0[/yt]

 

They responded by telling Hauser that he can take his report, fold it up as small as he can and stick it in the deepest, darkest part of his ass and then sit on it.

 

But it WAS proved!!! Mayweather was caught having an ILLEGAL & Excessive saline treatment 750ml to be exact. Which is many times the dose a hospital would give a patient who is dehydrated even in an emergeancy. Its PROVEN he did it
Its WHY he did it is what people want to know. We all know what that amount of saline would mask don't we.???? To clear his name all he has to do is explain why he needed it. Instead he ran off to Bora Bora with Justin Beiber
Face it He's almost certainly been abusing PED's his whole career & the NSAC & USADA let him do it
How do you spell

This content is protected

 

Mayweather is equally as guilty as Lance Armstrong I know it You know it Alex if youre honest Everyone knows it The NSAC & USADA know it too because theyre part of the conspiracy & corruption. Like was said earlier If they root out the rats nest look at the people that will lose big $$$$$$ plus their reputations Instead the corrupt people will destroy the sport Boxing cannot ever be regarded as a legitimate sport when corruption & greed are this rampant

 

and I bet you are solidly in the 'Floyd is clean camp'

 

What's your opinion then? Only about this case, and this case only. Not an "everyone is juicing" speech.

 

Has Floyd being questioned by any reporters on this

 

I think Floyd was most likely hiding something, I don't believe he was dehydrated to the point he needed an IV, it's hard to believe. Something to note though, I felt Mayweather and Pacquiao looked dehydrated after the weigh in and noticed they were guzzling water immediately after. But an IV? It's suspicious at best, nothing concrete, only speculation.

Other things to note, if it was in Mayweather's house and USADA "walked in" on him, and they're covering for him, why even report it? How would we know about it? What's the point in USADA reporting this if they are dirty too? Also, why would USADA risk their reputation and business for a man on the verge of retirement? Makes 0 sense. Mayweather can't pay an entire organization enough money to risk their entire business and everything they've built.

So my official opinion is: yes, it's shady, but proves nothing.

All Hauser is doing is starting a fire and fanning the flames, he hasn't unveiled anything.