So where are all the ppl. who said hype job Canelo is ducking a whooping from Trout?

Did you really think that through. How can he be ducking him at first and then acually end up and fighting him?

 

Trout needs a KO for a draw.

That said, he's the first prime Blevel+ full size LMW that Canelhoe has fought. Quite possibly, the only true LMW who is Blevel period.

Trout by devastating midround KO is my prediction.

Or Canelhoe by DQ b/c Trout threw his KO punch while Canelhoe was holding on for dear life and the ref was just about to step in and give Canelhoe a breather.:yep:yep:yep

 

Excuses already.I can already hear it.Trouts a bum who beat a shot cotto

 

People really do treat Canelo like **** I'll put his record against any 22 in this protected era.

 

This is EXACTLY how it will play out.

I cant see any situation where Canelo gets respect. For some reason hes just blindly hated by some here.

He beats Martinez @154, they'll say Martinez is old and was drained.
He beats Floyd @154,they'll say Floyd is old and fighting above his division.
He beats Trout,they'll say Trout only ever beat an old fat WW.
Beats any of the other top tanked LMW,they'll say they're shot, no good, blown up WW's etc etc etc.

Its like how some people are with Floyd,doesnt matter who he fights,they'll say his record is ****,and that hes ducking someone. When he fights the guy he was supposedly ducking,they'll say that guy was never that good.

RJJ got the same deal. He apparently ducked everyone and has a **** resume,despite easily handling 2 first round ballot HOF'ers,and numerous other champs.

 

Very well said I'm a huge RJJ fan and I see it.

 

no, how it will EXACTLY play out is if trout is able to outland canelo by 30+ punches and in eight of twelve rounds(eg.bernard/cloud) and lose a decision to canelo the alvarez nuthuggers will come here proclaiming that canelo landed the harded shots(even if his face says otherwise), showed superior ring generalship while dictating the fight and, therefore, was justifiably the winner.

im not saying that trout will outland canelo or even beat him but if the above scenario were to transpire that is EXACTLY how the clueless canelo nuthuggers will react.

because what is EXACTLY known here among the esb forum members is that the majority of canelo nuthuggers are pretty much the most clueless of the clueless.

ffs, there are threads out here mentioning canelo in the same breath with toney, tyson, holyfield, jones jr., vargas and curry after having the worst four fight title defenses in recent history.

how ****ing clueless is that?

 

So if he convincingly beats Trout, will you give him his due?

Or will you just deride Trout and make him out to be a nobody to begin with?

 

definately.

trout is the real deal because both ward and sergio have said so as well as him being an undefeated fighter that is in jeopardy of losing millions if he were to get beaten badly or kod by canelo.

these reasons alone give credibliity to austin trout and one would have to be blind if canelo were to beat him and not give alvarez credit...which i will have no problem doing.

but if trout were to outland canelo in eight of twelve rounds with knockdowns being equal and lose on the cards the last thing i want to hear from an alvarez nuthugger are words like how canelo had more ring generalship, power in his punches(if not physically apparant after the fight) and how he dicated the fight.

 

That was Pretty stupid LMAO, and has to be the shortest duck I can think of since canelo has been saying he wanted trout since January, and the Trout-Cotto fight was in December...

Canelo a hoe ducking the fish for a month, **** it had fear written all over it. what a pansy ducking ginger ****atsch:nut

 

you truly are an idiot, the Threads talking about Canelo alongside Tyson Holyfield and Tyson, were not to compare skills, or accomplishments you mentally handicapped ******, it was comparing their similar necks, Thick and short, if you wanna disagree with Iron Chin **** it, its definitely not proven like tysons holyfields or toneys, fine, but for your head to come to the conclusion that seeing their names next to each other speaking about anything other then similar necks you got to be a ****ing illiterate ****. Like really bro? are you this dumb?


The threads talking about Canelo alongside Vargas are just comparing how similar their careers are not exact copies because Vargas short career is better no doubt, but people mention his name alongside Vargas because Canelo's career has taken off at an early age and has the chance of ending early if he takes the same route HARD opposition, instead of a slower pace that could have prolonged the Vargas career.

now the curry ****, I was trolling the **** out of that thread, and I'm sure you have the link in which I explain the reasoning behind trolling that particular thread.



I would love to see you talk about breakdown, instead of just foreseeing controversy, your already starting the hating for the future since you dont even know whats going down next month.

You got what you wanted, trout is next. now just wait till the day comes to either give props or keep that hater **** going canelo could dominate trout, Ko him early, discover glass, close fight awarded to him, trout could win wide, close fight awarded to him if haymon pays more then GBP if someone has judges in their pockets , upset canelo by discovering glass... You just don't know it's 50/50 but I'm picking my guys attributes to beat Trouts. Can't wait.

 

Credit to both guys for making this fight, Trout's southpaw stance, movement, jab & bodywork will give Canelo trouble. I see Trout winning the fight

 

Don't start backtracking ******.Either trouts gonna win or he's gonna lose which is it???

 

For someone who was saying trout would win an 8 to 4 ud you sure putting up alot of but's.