This is kind of a garbled mess. Is there any particular reason you've stopped quoting my posts? And why are you talking about Vitali's brother again? Even in this thread, i've told you, don't worry about him fighting his brother - i must have said this to you literally twenty times. Best available. Try to understand before one of us dies. His brother is not available. Yes, we agree, for the twentieth time. I will not answer this question agian. I'm not about to start counting contenders. I know you're probably lying about Vitali's contenders though, that's another recurring theme, where you "forget" that so and so wasn't ranked, or wasn't ranked at five, or whatever it might be. I concede that Fury has fought fewer ranked contenders. He's also still fighting Regardless, Vitali only once met the best available contender to fight in his whole career. Already behind Fury and likely to fall further behind. In summary you are: - Clearing admitted steroids cheat Vitali Klitschk of wrong doing - Condemning steorids cheat Tyson Fury - Excusing VItali Klitschko for his utterly pitiful record at meeting the best available - BEST AVAILABLE NOT HIS BROTHER - - Condemning Tyson Fury for failing to meet the best - although he's met the best more often than Vitali already and may box another ten years Ok, you seem the right man to be passing judgement on these two
I think your being slightly disingenuous with your Marciano remark. We both know that there has been guys at the top of HW, taking on risk after risk, relatively, regardless of ranking. Too many easy touches for Fury along the way. Unless you think Hunter is a risk lol
No, i'm not being disingenuous, first of all i'm genuinely interested in the answer - I really want to know. I'll look up Holyfield later, because I think he might be it. Secondly, I'm just not interested in people disagreeing about who was better than who any more on the internet forums. You can find someone to tell you X was better than Y regardless - there are always those people, and none of them, to my knowledge, make their living predicting boxing. I'm satisfied that Wilder, followed by a weak opponent, followed by Joshua or Wilder, is a superb line up for a divisional number one and absolutely nothing you can say will convince me of the contrary.
@ Your McGrain trying to make this into a Klitschko fest. Its not going to work. Both were far more proven than Fury. Points you won't address. 1 ) How many ring magazine opponents did Fury beat who were renamed when he fought them? I say two Your reply is? 2 ) Vitali always tested clean a a pro. that my point. Don't you agree? Fury has not. Don't you agree? 3 ) Wlad was always better than the next #2 guy for Vitali when Vitali was active. It's a fact. The best aside from Wlad was Lewis who declined Vitali's re-match. Got it? If you have to talk about Vitlai's #2's contenders vs #3 contenders fought ( 3 fighters total ranked ), my answer is they would look really good on Fury paper thin resume.
And you really think that fighting Wilder, then Kabayel, then Anthony Joshua, you really think that's unacceptable? How do you feel about, say, Wanheng Menayothin, or Rey Varags? Do you just think of them as total jokes, guys that shouldn't be allowed to box professionally?
First of all, I use TBRB, but without looking, i think the answer is 3 for Ring and 4 for TBRB. I agree. Points you will not address: Vitali is an admitted cheat. Do you agree? I've told you ten or twelve times already. Dont' count Wlad. The best available excepting Wlad. I don't know why you can't understand this? Why can't you understand this? Listen: exclude his brother. Excluding his brother, total times Vitali met the best in the world: 1. That's pathetic. Do you agree?
I said it 3 times Vitali always tested clean as a pro. That's all that matters. He won all his pro fight fairly. He's not a pro cheat. Fury is. I also said Vitali had positive test as an amateur. It was 1 of 100 substances on the banded given to him by some doctor to heal an injury not the hard core stuff. Whether this was cheating by design, I can not say. I count Wlad as his best possible opponent put there. I can say don't count Wilder, he didn't deserve that #1 rank. Wilder ahas not beaten 1 ring magazine ranked opponent under the age of 36 an that guy was a joke who took him the distance. I hight doubt 3 or 4 actively ranked ring magazine opponents beaten by Fury. Who and when?
OK, so we agree, Vitali is a cheat, good. Now the difference is, Vitali admits misuse of drugs and cheating, Fury disputes the claim, so much that he took it to arbitration. Having recovered his mental health and still disputing the charge, he wanted to fight. Continuing to dispute the charge would make fighting impossible in his home country and difficult (but not impossible elsewhere). He was offered the following deal: accept the charge and receive backdated punishment that would not affect his career going forwards. Fury says he broke no rules but in order to continue with his career he accepted the backdated punishment. He was literally a man sentenced to time served. Now...bottom line? I think Fury probably cheated. That's on balance. But I know Vitali Klitschko is a cheat. I know that. What interests me is the way you try to denegrate one of them as a drugs cheat and give the other a total pass. Both claim they took the drug inadvertently, but you label one a cheat and give the other a pass. It's bias, and it's nonsense. Yeah, well if, one day, you're brave enough to look at who he fought excepting his brother you'll find 1 guy. That's pathetic. Don't know, not looking, don't care. Fury hasn't met many ranked contenders as i've said i think three times now. Let's pretend he's met none if it makes you happy. What I do know is that he's done well meeting the best in the world, much better than many much more experienced fighters. Those are the legacy fights. Beating the best in the world excepting yourself is the best thing you can do as a fighter. The second best thing is beating the second best fighter in the world excepting yourself. Fury's up to that, he's done ok.
Damn bro, where have you been? Fury's side is claiming that the contract expired, Finkel is claiming it hasn't, Wilder is nowhere to be found, and Fury is going to fight on the December 5 regardless.
Fury blowing his prime. His resume is weak. Two very big wins Wlad and Wilder. Wilder was extremely overhyped and Wlad while undeniably great was over the hill. Other than that resume is terrible. I doubt this bout will be against anyone of note as I believe the date the week before the Joshua bout is aligning them for a big fight. However if that is not the case - I think Ruiz or Hunter would be acceptable. Top 10 ring guys that the champ should handle
A) Yes, he has had a lot of wasted time, but... A) Its not his fault that there is a Covid pandemic C) Other fighters like Mahkmudov, Joyce and Majidov are starting these days at 32 or better B) Cunningham and ChisoraX2 were also good wins. Hammer and Johnson not bad in context. Wallin might go on to be pretty good himself. D) Now here is the big one...if he defeats Joshua, he is a top ten guy for cleaning out his era in a way that even a lot of great champs never manage.
Usually when fighters cherry pick this much there is a reason. Fury is carrying glass, it just hasn't been hit squarely. Well, Wilder caught up to him very late in the last round of their first fight and Wilder is not boxer. Once Fury fights someone who can both box and punch who isn't old he won't be champion anymore. Hunter is too small and a non puncher, it's the safest acceptable pick.
No we do not agree. Vitlai always test clean as a pro. That is a fact you have trouble admitting. Fury has not that is my point and 100% correct. I am talking about pro boxing here. This is pro boxing thread. I don't care as much about amateur boxing where Vitali was something close to 195-15. It's not like Vitali took the substance under the cover of darkness, it was doctor prescribed for an injury. It was one of 100 based substances to heal an injury, not hard for roids. Funny you opted out on naming the actively ranked me Fury beat. Your replied back you'd research. What happened? Now you are out? Why? Because you now I'm right. The count is Fury has beaten two actively Ring Ranked opponents. That's It. One was 39 year old, the other won't be fondly remembered as vey good and IMO is a knockout waiting to happen if he fights someone decent again. What's pathetic is you saying one thing in your articles, then saying the other when your feathers get ruffled. If I choose to, I have you saying one thing and doing a 180 to say the other. We both know it. Any time I want it. You'll quickly lose your cool. I'm too well researched for 1 up me, if that is your goal and just keep that in the back of your mind. Your goal in this thread it to smear Klitschko, a first ballot hall for fame fighter who has many title defenses, people avoiding him, who unlike Fury always tested cleanly s a pro. Anyway back to Fury. We can play a game. Using the Box Rec rankings as Fury surely won't fight a top ten contender ring magazine ranked contender, what ranked person do you think Fury will fight at Box Rec? My guess is outside of the top 25 at Box rec. Your forecast is.....?