So why not Bradley for Pacquiao?

Surely someone with 30K posts knows better.

 

Because he is boring and has no power and doesn't fight...

Pretty much what Pac said...

Who wants to watch such a fight again?

 

Futility perhaps?

 

It was between Bradley and Marquez. If he'd have picked Bradley, there would be a thread saying "Why not Marquez?!

 

Even if he is to fight the two at the same time there would be a thread saying, "why not include Cotto... at 154!"

 

it seems that it will happen down the line. pac seems to want the fight

 

or why not floyd? of course everyone knows the reason why right now.

 

The PPV numbers for one....2, the fight was more like a sparring session and completely one sided and Tim didn't make for an exciting fight.

It just doesn't make sense if no one really wants to see a boring mis match again.

 

Pacquiao is a humble man and he doesn't want to kill Bradley.

Pacquiao: The last time you left on a wheelchair, this time you'll leave on a stretcher.

 

this is why my boy timmy is so angry at team pac for not choosing him.. he and everyone else know they scurred. what else is new

 

Pacquaio already beat Bradley comfortably in the eyes of 99% of boxing fans.

His last fight with Marquez divided opinion on who had won it.

Pacquiao is taking the toughest fight out there for him.

Should be another classic, and I can't wait.

 

It was obvious from when Bob Arum robbed Bradley and then said Pacquiao will rematch Marquez not Bradley he's up to somethin, I think he will make Marquez win this one so when Pac loses to Mayweather Pac still has 2 fights that can sell

 

Not interesting. Pacquiao already beat that ass. Marquez's on the other hand never lost decisively and money wise it is just the better fight.