So Whyte isn’t gonna be made mandatory for Wilder...

kirk · May 3, 2019

Stallion said: ↑

I would say that the WBC has been generally treating Haymon's fighters very well, but there is a special collaboration in Wilder's case.

They have a number of Haymon's random heavyweights rated high in the rankings so they could basically block other fighters from becoming mandatory challengers. When necessary, WBC either orders illegitimate eliminators (like #4 vs #11) where they just skip certain fighters, or they outright create illegitimate mandatory challengers who didn't fight any eliminators (like Stiverne rematch) just so that it appears that Wilder fulfilled his mandatory obligations.

- WBC made Wilder vs. Scott (who wasn't even in top 10 WBC rankings) a mandatory challenger for Stiverne-Arreola II.
- WBC didn't allow Klitschko-Stiverne and forced Stiverne to defend vs Wilder without any voluntary defenses.
- WBC made Povetkin-Perez a final eliminator (after Povetkin won an eliminator vs Takam), then made him wait for Wilder-Duhaupas and Wilder-Szpilka before ordering Wilder-Povetkin.
- WBC then made Stiverne a "mandatory" without him having to fight any eliminators.
- WBC made Whyte wait a zillion fights despite him being #1 in the rankings and fighting multiple eliminators, only to skip him and randomly make Breazeale a mandatory based on his fight with non-top 10 rated Molina.

By WBC I mean Sulaiman, ever since the Sulaiman clan usurped the whole WBC and made it their personal organization.

It's obvious that Whyte is not getting his fair shake.
Click to expand...

Good post.

UKboxingfan · May 3, 2019

Stallion said: ↑

I would say that the WBC has been generally treating Haymon's fighters very well, but there is a special collaboration in Wilder's case.

They have a number of Haymon's random heavyweights rated high in the rankings so they could basically block other fighters from becoming mandatory challengers. When necessary, WBC either orders illegitimate eliminators (like #4 vs #11) where they just skip certain fighters, or they outright create illegitimate mandatory challengers who didn't fight any eliminators (like Stiverne rematch) just so that it appears that Wilder fulfilled his mandatory obligations.

- WBC made Wilder vs. Scott (who wasn't even in top 10 WBC rankings) a mandatory challenger for Stiverne-Arreola II.
- WBC didn't allow Klitschko-Stiverne and forced Stiverne to defend vs Wilder without any voluntary defenses.
- WBC made Povetkin-Perez a final eliminator (after Povetkin won an eliminator vs Takam), then made him wait for Wilder-Duhaupas and Wilder-Szpilka before ordering Wilder-Povetkin.
- WBC then made Stiverne a "mandatory" without him having to fight any eliminators.
- WBC made Whyte wait a zillion fights despite him being #1 in the rankings and fighting multiple eliminators, only to skip him and randomly make Breazeale a mandatory based on his fight with non-top 10 rated Molina.

By WBC I mean Sulaiman, ever since the Sulaiman clan usurped the whole WBC and made it their personal organization.

It's obvious that Whyte is not getting his fair shake.
Click to expand...

Great post, only the deluded could argue against all of that.

Sugarbutty · May 3, 2019

Stallion said: ↑

I would say that the WBC has been generally treating Haymon's fighters very well, but there is a special collaboration in Wilder's case.

They have a number of Haymon's random heavyweights rated high in the rankings so they could basically block other fighters from becoming mandatory challengers. When necessary, WBC either orders illegitimate eliminators (like #4 vs #11) where they just skip certain fighters, or they outright create illegitimate mandatory challengers who didn't fight any eliminators (like Stiverne rematch) just so that it appears that Wilder fulfilled his mandatory obligations.

- WBC made Wilder vs. Scott (who wasn't even in top 10 WBC rankings) a mandatory challenger for Stiverne-Arreola II.
- WBC didn't allow Klitschko-Stiverne and forced Stiverne to defend vs Wilder without any voluntary defenses.
- WBC made Povetkin-Perez a final eliminator (after Povetkin won an eliminator vs Takam), then made him wait for Wilder-Duhaupas and Wilder-Szpilka before ordering Wilder-Povetkin.
- WBC then made Stiverne a "mandatory" without him having to fight any eliminators.
- WBC made Whyte wait a zillion fights despite him being #1 in the rankings and fighting multiple eliminators, only to skip him and randomly make Breazeale a mandatory based on his fight with non-top 10 rated Molina.

By WBC I mean Sulaiman, ever since the Sulaiman clan usurped the whole WBC and made it their personal organization.

It's obvious that Whyte is not getting his fair shake.
Click to expand...

When you break it down like that it just shows you the level of corruption they are operating at, a disgrace to boxing.

Log in or Sign up

So Whyte isn’t gonna be made mandatory for Wilder...

kirk l l l Staff Member

UKboxingfan Boxing Addict Full Member

Sugarbutty New Member Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

So Whyte isn’t gonna be made mandatory for Wilder...

kirk l l l Staff Member

UKboxingfan Boxing Addict Full Member

Sugarbutty New Member Full Member