Some More Info on Carnera

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Aug 30, 2017.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,804
    29,246
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nope. There was a punch you showed it on here the argument is where it landed, and it was split in favour of those who couldn't be sure where the punch landed because Carnera's back obscured the view!
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Not me.
    I was referring to the commissions arbitrary pattern of punishing boxers.
    Whether it was a suspected fix, or if you were late to a meeting.
    Hell, if they were feeling confident in their own boxing skills, they might ban you over that too.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,804
    29,246
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not responsible for how you interpret my words.
     
  4. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    This place can be a bubble. Where people disagree with certain things just because a specific person said it.

    The Tyson-Spinks KO punch is obscured from every single camera angle.
    Are you also unsure if it was a real punch?

    This content is protected
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,804
    29,246
    Jun 2, 2006
    You tacitly agree then ,that you cant see where Carnera's punch lands? Progress!
    When you make a correct statement I will give you a like.As I did on the lighter classes not having punchers yesterday,so that's your little theory gone west. I've given likes to many on here that I've had diametrically oppossed views to on some subjects,Dago Wop,Galvatron,Klompton,even Janitor &Mendoza ! You perhaps ascribe your tendencies to others?