Some of my thoughts on weight classes.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Box84, Sep 29, 2009.


  1. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Firstly I must apologize for making yet another thread on weight classes. ​


    I know they are pretty common on here but I was running through a few calculations that hopefully some of you may find interesting.​

    There are currently 17 weight classes and IMO that should not increase.​


    There seems to be too many smaller classes so close together.​


    The higher weight classes are by comparison miles apart. ​


    Then there is 200lbs to infinity which leads to talk of a "Super Heavyweight" division being added.​


    It has been mentioned before that the best way to to space the divisions fairly is by a percentage of bodyweight.​


    If we start by looking at at 105lbs to 108lbs, the difference is roughly 3%. ​


    If we continue that 3% increase through 17 divisions we would get something like this:​


    3%​
    105​
    108.15​
    111.3945​
    114.736335​
    118.17842505​
    121.7237778015​
    125.375491135545​
    129.136755869611​
    133.0108585457​
    137.001184302071​
    141.111219831133​
    145.344556426067​
    149.704893118849​
    154.196039912414​
    158.821921109787​
    163.58657874308​
    168.494176105373​


    As you can see we have only reached 168. This proves to me beyond doubt that there are "too many smaller classes so close together."​


    4%​
    105​
    109.2​
    113.568​
    118.11072​
    122.8351488​
    127.748554752​
    132.85849694208​
    138.172836819763​
    143.699750292554​
    149.447740304256​
    155.425649916426​
    161.642675913083​
    168.108382949606​
    174.832718267591​
    181.826026998294​
    189.099068078226​
    196.663030801355​


    Better but we only reach 196.​


    5%​
    105​
    110.25​
    115.7625​
    121.550625​
    127.62815625​
    134.0095640625​
    140.710042265625​
    147.745544378906​
    155.132821597852​
    162.889462677744​
    171.033935811631​
    179.585632602213​
    188.564914232324​
    197.99315994394​
    207.892817941137​
    218.287458838193​
    229.201831780103​


    Very interesting.​


    6%​
    105​
    111.3​
    117.978​
    125.05668​
    132.5600808​
    140.513685648​
    148.94450678688​
    157.881177194093​
    167.354047825738​
    177.395290695283​
    188.039008137​
    199.32134862522​
    211.280629542733​
    223.957467315297​
    237.394915354215​


    Just for fun this is 6% over only 15 divisions.​


    Obviously another argument is where to start the divisions - 105/higher/lower and where the last division should start 200/220/240 etc. ​


    And yet another, how many divisions there should be?​


    Of course you could choose where you wish to start and end. Then choose the number of divisions you want. Then devise an equal % from that, making your perfect formula.​


    What do you guys think? Would it be a better if all divisions were separated by an equal percentage? ​
     
  2. Davo-The-Don

    Davo-The-Don Big Swinging Thang Full Member

    798
    0
    Jun 13, 2008
    hmmm. interesting, you may have a point. but "the new 199.32134862522 Lb champion" just doesn't sound right to me. :lol:
     
  3. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,815
    2,059
    Jul 19, 2004
    I don't think any reasonably fit male is under 120lbs. There might be some really short and thin guys who are that light or lighter, but I don't think it's prevalent enough to have special categories.
     
  4. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    I was going to mention that I couldn't be bothered to remove all the numbers after the decimal points!:oops: I forgot to and it is the first thing commented on!:patsch
     
  5. JL Fighter

    JL Fighter Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,350
    7,170
    Mar 24, 2009
    like spreadsheets much?
     
  6. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    You are correct. There are too many weight classes at the lower wieghts. I think most would agree with you
     
  7. Davo-The-Don

    Davo-The-Don Big Swinging Thang Full Member

    798
    0
    Jun 13, 2008

    i'm glad you left them there, it would keep the MC busy in the ring.

    seriously though, i think theres way too many lower weight classes.
     
  8. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    5% - 14 Divisions.
    120
    126
    132.3
    138.915
    145.86075
    153.1537875
    160.811476875
    168.85205071875
    177.294653254688
    186.159385917422
    195.467355213293
    205.240722973958
    215.502759122656
    226.277897078788
     
  9. Davo-The-Don

    Davo-The-Don Big Swinging Thang Full Member

    798
    0
    Jun 13, 2008

    yes he like spreadcheeks. :lol:
     
  10. BrooklynMumin

    BrooklynMumin HOPKINS A " G " Full Member

    6,797
    4
    Aug 17, 2008
  11. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    It's the first time I've used one since I left school 9 years ago. It took me a while to work out how to use it. Then I think I got carried away!:lol:
     
  12. Davo-The-Don

    Davo-The-Don Big Swinging Thang Full Member

    798
    0
    Jun 13, 2008

    c'mon, it's not the worst, i think evenly spaced divisions might not be a bad idea, i think you might see division hopping though, particularly at the higher end where it's not as common as the lower divisions at present. at least it would give bigger guys the chance to be a 5 weight world champion for example.
     
  13. Box84

    Box84 Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Seriously I've been reading this site daily since the build up to the Hatton V Mayweather fight. I registered 7 separate times, months apart before I finally received a confirmation email. What's up with that?:-(