Any person that worries about PFP rankings has nothing at all to do. PFP rankins are mythical like ****ing harry potter or some ****. They mean nothing at all. Who ever created them should get there ass kicked for making something for people to argue about. A grown man at 147 can never be the best figher in the world if there are a hundred people above him that could play with him in the ring and ko his ass at any given moment.
The ******s are out tonight! Do you not understand what "pound for pound" means??? :hi: welcome to ESB
ok even with that IF HE DOES WELL, HE'LL BE NUMBER ONE, even that is crap.. how can pacquaio be ahead of calzaghe, hopkins??? that doesnt make any sense
i thought putting pac ahead of prettyboy was the only crap.. now all of the sudden, being ahead on calzaghe and b-hop was also crap? now whats your point?
people put pacquiao on the top 10 p4p list because hes an exciting fighter who beat a shell of a former barrera and morales. It is crap that he would be ranked ahead of fighters who have made 20+ defenses and been champs for 10 years+, that is a shame.
so your real point is not being ahead on prettyboy on whos #1 ? your true point is why pac being rated on the top 10 p4p is that it?
The thread you showed are an "if" scenario. If Cotto beats Margo, Williams, Hopkins, Calzaghe & Wlad his is no.1. Larry Merchant claimed Pac to be p4p1 during some fight, so did many people at the time. That was because Pac was coming off some big wins whereas Floyd hasnt fought and beat DLH & Hatton yet. Since PBF beat those fighters and Pac hasnt done anything of note since, really not many people could argue than PBF was #1.