Someone explain The Ring mag ratings

You of all people complaining about an organization's ratings?! Yet, you have the WBO's ratings of the 1980s memorized and treat them as gospel, despite the fact that they rated a dead man

 

This

All you have to see is Broner is number 1 at Lightweight and he's not even a Lightweight.

And if that's not ridiculous enough, he is, wait for it......

In the pound for pound top 10!!!!

atschatsch:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

DLH owns the ring magazine.

 

I've just notice friggin Canelo is too :-(

If Mayweather didn't prove he wasn't elite, then I guess CJ Ross is on the ranking committee.

 

How does losing t mayweather prove u not elite? Canelo got the same treatment everyone else got which was a loss.

 

Mayweather moved up in weight and Canelo did worse than Guerrero and Cotto did.

 

Ill have a go at it;

First, Oscar snorts cocaine- lots of cocaine. Depending on the day/time PCP might be involved too. Then he comes up with the rankings while snorting more cocaine- and a webmaster puts them on the website.

That is how the Ring ranking works. Thank you for reading my comprehensive explanation.

 

I think people have noticed how **** they have become recently. I was looking at ESPN's the other day. Their P4P rankings are fairly respectable but hilariously, someone voted for Lomachenko as number 10 despite the fact he's had one fight

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/10000512/espn-pound-pound-rankings

 

LOL, you quote rankings more than any other poster on this forumatsch.

I have seen countless threads where you try to defend a certain fighters record by citing their rankings (usually by the WBO). Now Bailey do not try and re-write history here mate.

My point is if you criticize the Ring it is just as corrupt as any other organization and is light years better than the WBO (back then) who literally had ranked a dead man after he passed away.

I guess if you never use a fighters ranking in an argument, then you would agree that it has very little merit in this practice given the **** organizations that do it

 

They removed Marco Huck from the Cruiserweight ratings just to have a fight for the title. Then put him back in straight after.

Then to defended their behavior, they totally changed their championship policy.

 

because it's American biased.

the writer's for the magazine are ******ed in the extreme. everything about it is absolutely gash!

it isn't the bible of boxing. it's just a pile of unreadable ****. no one should take any notice of what it has to say.

worthless magazine.