Its not me you have to break it to, its the people that try to claim all other ratings are worthless compared to the ring mags I didnt know they entered the P4P ratings
Is that all you got out of that? You brought up how the smw he fought in was stronger than today because he beat a guy who later went on to be a fringe contender in another division years later. They simply weren't world class fighters. Whether the division was stronger back then or not wouldn't change it. Nobody believes it was stronger back then anyway, which is why the rankings were littered with regional fighters and journeymen types. Many solid fighters, but they were what they were. You're pretty much on an island with that one.
This content is protected Someone explain again these ratings. D Wilder is in the Ring top 10 but who did he beat as good as 35-1 Scott who Chisora beat? Explain??
Zie Ring magazine ist eine lauging stock, zhey have Broner in zhere top 10 p4p for beating who? Vilder ist zie glass jawed joke, he vouldn't last 2 minutes on zie European circuit.
It would be interesting to see how both would have done on the European circuit and see where they both would be in their careers now. I dont know how Wilder would have done if in so few fights had of fought at the same level as Fury, Haye, Chisora, Helenius, Pulev etc
Further questions Broner beat Malignaggi, in his next fight he lost to Maidana and is now rated at 10 with Paulie at 8. I dont know how Broner gets placed below Paulie when he beat him one fight previously. Also Broner is noted with a loss and at number 10 at WW, yet is number 1 at LW with no loss. Im confused with these ratings