something very ironic and funny about the super 6 and their fans!

Dirrell IMO didnt win the fight , he didnt fight enough to get the decision thats my opinion , now beleive me , im a UK boxing fan and wanted nothing more than to see Dirrell go in there and expose Froch like he should of , but fact are facts he didnt and Froch won !!!!!!!!!!!

Kessler got exposed , he got battered , outclassed , its been coming and i cant beleive its took so long to happen but hey !!!!!!!

 

Yes i know , there are not many boxing fans who just say what they see , its laughable at times , makes for a good argument though and hell we all love one of them !!!!! :good

 

Beaten does not equal exposed. Ali didn't expose Foreman. Foreman didn't expose Frazier. Pacquiao didn't expose Cotto. Cotto didn't expose Mosley. Mosley didn't expose ODLH. ODLH didn't expose Chavez. Ward didn't expose Kessler. When the guys at the top fight each other, somebody usually has to lose.

 

I haven't heard any accusations of robbery from any fans of kessler, or from kessler himself. I do think that the headbutts were questionable...he lead with his head during the Miranda fight as well...but no one thinks it was a robbery...Ward fought a terrific fight and no one should try to take that away from him.

Now Dirrell, on the other hand, should be ashamed of himself. Both Froch and Dirrell should be embarrassed by their performances...

But the way Dirrell acted before the fight...and then not showing up against a man who should have been schooled? I can't believe there are any fans of Dirrell after that performance. Anyone who is insisting that the fight against Froch was a robbery, is out of his mind. Neither man deserved a victory that night...what an awful fight.

It's pretty simple...If you don't have the guts to knock your man out then you deserve a bull**** decision. Andre Ward had the right idea...dominate your opponent and don't make it seem like you're afraid to get hit!!

Maybe if Dirrell hadn't looked like a chicken-**** all night, maybe the judges would have given him the decision...he definitely landed the cleaner more effective shots.

By the way, if you think Dirrell won the fight against Froch, who do you think won the Williams/Martinez fight?

 

The argument for Dirrell being robbed is that he clearly showed he is a more capable fighter than Froch. That doesn't necessarily mean he deserved a win, but Froch rarela landing meaningful punches made it a very questionable decision.

Ward on the other hand was clearly better than Kessler, the controvery was all about his dirty tactics, which he would not have needed to win. Two very different situations.

 

I know it does'nt **** for brains !!!!!!!!

The point i was making is that Froch and Kessler are both over rated and there are fighters @168 who can , should of and will expose them !!!!!!

Ward did expose Kessler , who's only other non hand picked fight was Joe Calzaghe , Jermain Taylor exposed Froch right up until the point he had no gas left , Dirrell had the tools to do the job but he didnt end of discussion !!!!!!

 

If you think Kessler was exposed that night, you must think that Librado Andrade doesn't deserve to be in the ring with anyone.

Kessler is a very good fighter who is not used to being man-handled and not used to fighting a rough, close-quartered fight. He simply was not the better man that night. No shame in that.

Froch is still undefeated and beat two very good fighters leading up to the Dirrell fight. He decisioned Jean Pascal and knocked out Jermain Taylor.

Sounds like your hatred for both men is clouding your judgment.

 

That's neither ironic or funny.

The bit about Kessler fans is just plain incorrect.

 

none...I know Kessler fans are complaining that a ref anywhere else in the world would have deducted points from Ward, but no robbery. Kessler clearly lost the fight...the judges cards were accurate. He was getting beaten to the punch in every round and looked very average against Ward.

Now please tell me, if you are looking for the harder and more effective punches, how could anyone think that Paul Williams won the fight against Martinez?

you seem to think Dirrell did enough to win a decision over Froch for doing less. Please explain.

 

exposed as rusty:good he might have still lost the fight if he wasnt but exposed is the generaly used by the more stupid people in this forum, please dont fall into that bracket:good