something very ironic and funny about the super 6 and their fans!

:good Americans and Irony.....

 

No not at all big man !!!!!!!

Your right i hate Froch , but the reason i hate him is because he is so over rated , and of course the **** he talks !!!!!!

Ok , ill get to my point , the Kessler defeat has been coming , yes he done well for rounds 1 - 6 against Calzaghe but other than that he's been padded out and protected and that has finally caught up with him , he was soundly beaten by a better boxer , no man handling no head butting a better fighter , and anybody who has watched and study'd Kessler all knew that before the fight Ward was gonna beat him using better boxing fundamantals !!!!!!!

Now if Kessler after 44 proffesional fights is not used to being man handled and not fighting rough then maybe he has fooled us all and wasnt actually a pro boxer for all them years ................... give me a break for **** sake !!!! atschatschatsch :huh:huh:huh

Froch , i have seen Froch as British Champ and now world champ and have been waiting for the day somebody shuts the ****er up and Taylor very nearly did that , thats the same Jermain Taylor who was stopped by Pavlik twice and KO'd by Abraham in a 1 sided fight !!!!!!! , and Froch went life and death with him and if not for Taylor running out of gas would have been the former champ !!!!!! , now Dirrell fundamentaly is a better boxer than Carl Froch , he just didnt have the balls to go in there and show it !!!!!!

In summary Froch and Kessler are both over rated fighters always have been and Kessler has now been exposed at the top level and it wont be long before Froch suffer's the same fate !!!!!!!

What the hell this has to do with Librado Andrade i dont know !!!! :huh

 

Big man i dont like to use the word exposed in boxing but i feel thats the perfect description of Kessler Ward !!!!!

Kessler was not rusty , 2 months before the fight he had an un in pressive 5th rnd TKO against Perdomo , 6 months after the Calzaghe fight (no excuses there) he looked like **** against Sartison , the guy is over rated , simple as that , he has been looked after in Denmark and the small amount of success he had against Calzaghe was looked on too highly !!!!!!!!

 

i thought you said that you studied all of Kessler's fights? He looked like a very complete fighter against a very tough opponent like Librado Andrade...you know, the same guy who almost knocked out Bute in the final round of Bute/Andrade I.

i'm sorry...i have to disagree with your assessment of both fighters. Kessler is a very skilled fighter, but styles make fights...and yes, some fighters don't like tough, rugged fights and don't react well when a fight becomes rough on the inside. A prime example is current Heavyweight Champ Wlad Kitschko...would you say that he's a bad fighter because he doesn't favor a rough, inside fight? Hell no!!

And Froch...well a lot of questions have come up since the Dirrell fight, and yes he looked very questionable...but, he's undefeated. He's the current WBC Champ...and his girlfriend is probably hotter than yours. I can see why you don't like him.

Well, look on the bright side; kessler and Froch are fighting each other next year for the WBC title...a fight that you should love: two of your most hated fighters beating the **** out of each other!!

 

Dirrell was a high way robbery.

 

LMOA !!!!!!!!!!!

 

Looking good against a gate keeper does not make you a super star , thats the mantle Kessler is placed upon by most European fans , and he just isnt , its that simple , yes he has some decent wins on his record but not great , Mundine , Andrade , Beyer are all good pro's but nothing out of the ordinary world class mmm , maybe yes , top level no !!!!!!

We'll agree to disagree on Froch and im quite certain i know more on Froch than you , judging by what you have said about the guy , clearly you didnt watch the Taylor fight or his fight with a washed up shot to peices Robin Reid !!!!!!!

 

You're not making it easy to take you seriously enough to argue back, so I'm not going to. Also it doesn't look like you actually do know how to use the term 'exposed'. Therefore, I can assume it's a waste of time for me to continue to logically and rationally discuss anything with you. Perhaps I should just unnecessarily insult you back with 6-10 exclamation points in an attempt to play down to your level. Oh, I'm sorry. I mean: shut up poopy head!!!!!!!

Now, go back to your Lego set and take a nap with your blanky.

 

Whether or not Paul won that fight is debatable. But, hands down, Martinez landed the cleaner, harder, and more effective shots. Paul threw and landed more punches though, hence the controversy.

Like I stated before, neither man did enough to merit a decision in my opinion. Yes, Dirrell was easily landing the cleaner more effective shots when he wasn't hugging Froch or running away from him. But, one or two clean shots per round isn't going to sway the judges, unless it's a knock down. Your argument is that "Froch didn't do ****"...well Dirrell didn't do much more...Froch looked like the only man in the ring who was interested in fighting that night...and, well, I guess the judges rewarded him for that.

one thing is for certain, both men didn't create any new fans from either performance, and in my opinion, Dirrell's case isn't one worth arguing about.

 

A couple of examples of the defenition of the word " EXPOSED "

" Having no protecting or concealing cover "

" lacking protection or defense "

A couple of Adjectives of the word " Exposed "

Revealed , Unveiled , Uncovered !!!!!!!!

In relation to boxing terms

This content is protected

" Kessler - Ward " :deal

 

Actually i did see the Taylor fight and it made me sad...Taylor had the fight won if he stayed on his feet...but credit to Froch for pressuring Taylor and knocking him out within 12 rounds.

Yes, I agree that froch's mouth is a little more than just arrogance, but his inadequacies make for entertaining fights.

Wow...and Librado Andrade a gatekeeper? Dude, you're harsh!! He beat a very tough fighter in Vitali Tsypko to earn the mandatory spot against Bute...gate keepers aren't usually mandatory opponents...those fighters are called contenders.

Also, my final comments on Kessler are: we have to wait and see how he bounces back from this one sided loss...most champions lose but Real Champions learn from defeat and come back stronger. Is he a real Champ or someone who was overrated? Only time will tell.

 

the difference is taylor came to fight and fought for 12 rounds, and froch finally got to him, but even without the knockout he hardly exposed him.

if dirrel had fought for 12 rounds he could well have stopped froch, but it could have also given froch a better chance of landing something meaningfull, and froch knows how to finish if he did land something big.