I'll be honest, I've never ignored people that run around making obsessive criticisms of fighters again and again and again, for years really. The forum as a whole has never put up with it. It hasn't been recently either. There's been numerous arguments with one poster. Probably close to 10 posters in recent months.
That's up to you, but if he has you on ignore and you're quoting quoting quoting him, you're the one stoking an endless feud.
@swagdelfadeel i've quoted you and asked you directly some questions, you've entered the thread, put up some likes, then left again; is this because you are busy or because you've nothing to say?
No I wasn’t the guy with a previous endless disagreement. I’m not even part of this discussion yet you’ve called me in. Leave it out or I can duly comment as to the actual facts of the matter.
wtf. Well, the actual facts of the matter are you and Enteawood were involved in one of the worst endless conflicts I've ever seen on his forum. I flipped the coin and he got the bullet and you didn't, then you got into another one with Journeyman. Because you were the one with the history of getting into feuds that forced me to permanently remove a poster, which I hate, you were the one that received the stiff warning over your conflict with Journeyman. I "called you in" because you were able to change you behaviour with Journeyman and continue to post on the forum. But by all means "duly comment as the actual facts of the matter".
The woman I’m seeing currently has a daughter with non-verbal autism and we’re dealing with a meltdown right now. In addition I also have an essay due for college by midnight so I do not have much time nor energy to respond with the attention I think this particular issue deserves. I will respond in full whenever I have the time and hopefully get some sleep.
@McGrain Since we're on the topic and it does involve me as someone who's also feuding with these people and been punished for it. I feel its a bit unfair that you admit both sides are at fault but then only punish one side while giving the other more leeway. Either punish everyone equally or don't but only punishing one side makes it seem like you're picking favorites. I'm happy to ignore them and let bygones be bygones, as I've done since i got back, but thats my perspective.
Okay, so does “wtf” mean bets are on off on the swear filter? Just checking on the current lay of the land. You said don’t speak of Entaowed but it’s been YOU who has brought him up consistently, even well after he’s been gone. What’s up with that? Reads like your own obsession, not mine - perpetuating your own “imagined” theme. I never brought him up - such was/is my actual, non obsession with the guy. Entaowed was THE common denominator for arguments all over the place and when he wasn’t incessantly reporting, he was threatening this, that and the other poster with same. When he got perma banned, I copped a temp ban at the same time for NO reason. I had not spoken to or of him as at that time. That’s a FACT. So what was that? Me being framed as a “fall guy” to soften Entaowed’s long overdue perma ban. That’s what that was. A coin toss? For you maybe but I doubt it was for anyone else. I didn’t read any posts lamenting Enta’s expulsion - not a one - and I know for a FACT that there were a good number of members who were glad to see him go. I didn’t force you to do anything. Now you have another common denominator causing all manner of problems - just like before but pretending you can’t see that. Let’s see - one poster in question has never been banned. Meanwhile, the other is an Alt of previous perma ban and that Alt already has several bans under his belt. And YET, you arrive at both members being on the precipice of a perma ban. Totally irrational. You wield the big stick but don’t try and pretend that you make any sense in your attempts to justify yourself. Did you somehow miss the countless times JM spoke of or tried to engage me without solicitation? He was also clearly told - “Not interested “. You shouldn’t have - I highlighted same to you on several occasions after you warned me but you just ignored same, so set was your flawed compass and your obvious fixation with Entaowed. That’s also not including all the times before over a long period when JM desperately tried to spark up arguments with me, along with a number of other posters. On those occasions he was also told by me “Not interested”. You say “Then I got into another one…”. Lol, how long AFTER Entaowed was banned was it when you felt need to falsely implicate me in a so called long running feud with JM? If I am the long running feuder you’re falsely trying to suggest me to be, what “examples” do you have aside from Enta and JM - who were/are THE common denominators for long running feuds with myriad posters? That’s right, you’ve got it arse up. So here I am travelling along fine and, with JM at war again with other members, you inexplicably “call me” in again for no good reason, based on an entirely false premise and your own, long held skewed perceptions and obsessions. You can’t see the stupidity in all that? I mean , you could’ve/should’ve left it out…I’m not involved in any way shape or form here - but of course you couldn’t leave it out - it’s your own long running obsession. You’re right, What The Actual ****?!
I disagree with everything you wrote, and will be leaving that there. This isn't open season on commentary for forum moderation.
no. I can see what kind of post this is going to be though. I can speak about Entaowed - or any other poster I want at any time I want - what are you talking about? I think i've mentioned him twice in a year. Why on earth is that an obsession? This is weird, weird posting and being frank I don't have any time or interest. # You were placed on a final warning, on multiple occasions, with Ent during your feud with him, both publicly and in private messages. You also promised to place him on ignore and it was very clear how all of that worked out. You were treated with fairly - with leniency I would say. You got into another endless row with Journeyman, and you were told that if it continued you'd be removed from the forum. I commend you for the change in your behaviour towards him and that's why I mentioned you today. That is absolutely ridiculous on every level. A poster CANNOT argue endlessly on their own. You argued endlessly with Ent and survived the 50/50 call. You were every bit as bad as he was IMO and the claim that you were banned for "no reason" is absolutely preposterous in every way. This doesn't matter even a little bit. I have to be satisfied you have been treated fairly and so do the owners of the site. You're opinion is by definition the least interesting of all. I don't think you were treated fairly - i think you were treated with leniency. Probably nobody would have "lamented" your expulsion either had you gone at that time and it absolutely was as close as it could possibly be. I think that you've misunderstood somehow what happened here today. I'm not sure what's made you so aggressive and difficult in the course of your post to me, but I will say this - if you think, because your name was mentioned in a conversation about someone else, you can accuse me of dishonesty, bias and pretence, you are sadly mistaken. Now to avoid any more unpleasantness, i'm not going to read any more of your post, btu to be absolutely clear, what's above this line is reason enough to permanently remove you. It would be a) within the rules and b) given your history as a poster proportional.