Sonny Liston vs James J Jefferies

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Sep 10, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,314
    11,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    Who said only Joe Louis fought a bum of the month!
     
    Longhhorn71 likes this.
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,725
    46,416
    Feb 11, 2005
    Why does Jeffries supposedly have superior stamina? Because he couldn't get any of his band of midgets out quicker than 20 rounds and had to play the attrition game with them? Meanwhile Liston was icing his opponents early and enjoying a Scotch at the point the 20th round gong would have sounded. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of fistic prowess.
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,725
    46,416
    Feb 11, 2005
    Takes them in a Biblical Way? That's the only way I can imagine he could pull such a thing off.
     
  4. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,104
    36,927
    Jul 24, 2004
    I seriously believe Primo Carnera would ko Jeffries whose only real skill was the ability to get the crap knocked out of him but survive to defeat someone weighing 20-30 less. Carnera coulda also absorb punishment and had better boxing skills. Anyway Jeffries would take a bundle from the mob to take a dive.

    Regarding Liston...Sonny wins via TKO6.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,892
    44,681
    Apr 27, 2005
    End thread/
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    A fighter taking a shellacking in one or two fights but not most of them, does not make them a guy who relied on absorbing punishment to wear their opponent down.

    It just means that they came up against somebody who found a way to penetrate their defence consistently.

    Then if secondary accounts are based on that fight, a misleading picture can start to emerge.

    Jeffries certainly wasn't some prehistoric version of George Chuvalo.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    This sort of thing ill informed comment is painful to read!

    People need to look at what people were actually saying about Jeffries at the time.
     
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,314
    11,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    I don't think that Liston would respond too kindly to someone implying homosexuality to him.

    Seems like the sort of thing that would provoke him to violence.
     
  9. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    You would then seem to be perpetuating a bias on the other side of things. We know the flowery language used by writers at the time to describe fighters. It reminds me of this:

    This content is protected


    You'd think some of these fighters could shoot fireballs from their arse... The press knew heroes and people bigger than life sold papers, ya know the business their in... to sell papers. The fact that you'd like us to take the flowery language of the time over what we can see with out own eyes about a fighter says enough about your evidence.
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Because he fought with injured shoulder ( round two after flooring Sharkey ) against a hall of fame fighter thought of as the Rocky Marciano of his times under white hot lights for 25 rounds. People in the crowd passed out in that heat. Just imaging fighting in it. Reports say Jeffries lost 15 pounds during the match.

    As for midgets and runts, that applies to Marshall, who Liston had 25 pounds on too.
     
    The Morlocks and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don't think that you can dismiss everybody around at the time, as either a nostalgic or a racist.

    While of course these factors are prevalent among them, there are people who call it correctly in every era.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  12. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Again though, knowing the times, and knowing what they are trying to do...sell papers and appease the minority in power by perpetuating myths and racial bias... I should somehow view this flowery language as same level of proof as what I can see with my eyes?
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,725
    46,416
    Feb 11, 2005
    If you believe this, I am happy for you. It must be nice.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    The problem is that this flowery language is all that you have, because there is nothing much to look at with your own eyes, and what little you have is very inconclusive.

    Now while it is possible that many people in the era were biased in the way that you say, it does not seem very credible that everybody was biased, or that everybody was wrong.

    Has there ever been a champion where the conclusions about them became inescapable (say Muhammad Ali or Wladamir Klitschko), where every contemporary observer got it wrong?

    That is what you are asking us to believe!
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    The injury is very reliably verified.

    An x ray still survives.