Sonny Liston vs. Jersey Joe Walcott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hookie, Feb 24, 2012.


  1. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Who wins and why?
     
  2. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Liston fans are pretty insane. There is a thread about Liston vs. Marciano that is over 20 pages. Anyway, I'm wondering how this one will go.

    Many of the Liston lovers act like Liston was a huge man but really he wasn't much bigger than Walcott. Liston was about 1/2 an inch taller and 10-15 Lbs. heavier. Liston had a longer reach as well. Walcott was quicker with his hands and feet, had better footwork, was more elusive, and had better defense. Both fighters were strong, accurate, had good stamina, and durable. Sure, Liston had more power and the better chin... I'm not convinced he was much stronger than Walcott though.

    We are looking at both at their very best. Walcott was hot and cold at times but at his best he was great.

    At Walcott's best he lost 2 tough fights vs. Joe Louis... LSD15 (even Louis thought Walcott won) and LKO11 (Walcott up on points prior to the KO), he also beat Charles 2 out of 4 times, 1 win by KO. Walcott was up on points vs. Marciano prior to getting stopped in the 13th (Walcott was also stopped in 1 round by Marciano, his last pro fight). 2-6 (1) vs. these Hall of Famers, they were all HW World Title fights. As mentioned above... most sane people feel that he beat Louis in their first fight.

    He also beat Elmer Ray KO3 and W10 (he also lost a SD to Ray), Curtis Sheppard W8 and KO10, Joe Baksi W10, Lee Q. Murray WDQ9, Jimmy Bivins W10, Lee Oma W10, Joey Maxim W10 x2 (he also lost a close decision to Maxim), and Harold Johnson KO3 among others. 11-2 (3) vs. these fighters.

    How does the fight go?
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I have Liston. I believe the great jab and barrages to the torso (which will be thrown and will do damage regardless of accuracy) will offset the great footwork and countering of Walcott. It would be brilliant to watch. Liston was just better imo, no disrespect meant at all to Walcott, a fantastic boxer, best footwork ever in heavyweight history most likely.
     
  4. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Liston by decision. I can see how people could envision Walcott winning though. Walcott's accurate punches would pay dividends. however, I think liston's combos and jabs would get to Walcott eventually regardless of Walcott being such a great defensive fighter. Liston's reach would also come into play here.

    I think that Walcott would do well though.
     
  5. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
    Liston by KO

    Walcott was not very good.
     
  6. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
  7. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011
    Louis, Marciano and Charles all discovered this was a bogus opinion.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,650
    Dec 31, 2009
    I think walcott (on his best day) goes one better than burt whitehurst and can beat Liston through being slick and timing him. Thats not entirely discounting sonny's chances, liston can hit as hard as joe louis but was he as fast? elmer ray was a big man and so was baksi, walcott had seen it all before and he hit plenty harder than the men who knocked out Liston.The best version of Liston could not knock out machen who spoiled all night - walcott was the ATG spoiler though and he banged harder then machen.Its a 50-50 fight but if it is his best day walcott is better than anyone liston beat, he has the class to do it.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    Walcott ,and Charles for that matter ,were not highly regarded during their reigns ,or for a considerable time after.
    It is only comparatively recently that they have acquired higher status.

    Louis had slid noticeably when he faced Walcott.
     
  10. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011
    A lot of fighters weren't. It doesn't mean anything to me now though.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,700
    21,317
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm fully accepting of the possibility that a peak jersey joe (basically that 5 years he was a full time hw and consistently a top contender or champion) would move ahead on points vs a peak sonny liston (60-64). Jersey might even make liston look foolish at some points in the fight sticking to the outside and jerking his way in and out of range landing combinations from any angle.

    At some point in the fight, maybe even the championship rounds, liston will corner jersey and at that moment it's over.

    My pick is a come from behind ko.

    There's every chance ofcourse that a peak liston quits on his stool rather than stalk for the knockout but this is how I see it going.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,406
    9,358
    Jul 15, 2008
    WHy do you frame your debates with distorted facts out of the gate ...Tyson may have been a half inch shorter than Marciano. Were they the same size as well ? Size is not simply measured by height. Liston had ten inches in reach and twenty one pounds of muscle on Walcott . He was a far more powerful man with a huge reach advantage.

    AS far as a fight goes Joe matches up much better than Rocky does but I see Sonny ultimately beating him similar to Machen .. Walcott would be cute and have his moments but he was not the bravest guy in the world, did not take the greatest shot and would survive but lose a competitive , interesting bout ..
     
  13. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    I'm going to go for Walcott here. I like Sonny, but Walcott proved that he could box a banger for long periods. There is no doubt in my mind that Walcott beat Joe Louis 1st time around, and he was also outboxing him in the second fight before Wong stopped. He was also ahead on the cards before Rocky caught up with him.

    He would time Liston all night lMO, and evade him with his better footwork and slickness.

    The only thing I'd worry about is Walcott's tendency to either fall asleep in fights, or gas late on. Liston could well capitalise on this and knock joe out. But I don't think Liston hit as hard as Louis or Rocky.

    Walcott by decision for me
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,406
    9,358
    Jul 15, 2008

    I agree he would be hard to trap .. Joe was slick and crafty and could sock ... My thought is that he would have to take a lot of risks to do so enough to decision Liston and that would expose him to a lot of punishment ... it's one thing to box and clinch a man with a 67" reach ... another when you have to work your own way inside a huge reach disadvantage to be effective ... either way I do agree he is a very interesting challenge ..
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good Post!:good