Sonny Liston vs Joe Frazier: Video

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Jun 18, 2010.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Spare me. Liston finished a fight with a BROKEN JAW(excrutiating pain) and also came back to win a fight after getting his nose badly broken. When did Vitali ever show heart like this? Vitali looked to me he had only a couple rounds left against Lewis...lewis was getting to him big time.

    If fighting 6 rounds with a broken jaw is not a display of heart...then I don't know what is. There have also been many instances in history where fighters have quit once they got their nose broken(Genaro Hernandez, Francisco Damiani) for example. Liston, instead, fired back and knocked him out in the next round.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes.

    Explain why shipping punches to Williams is funny?



    So Vitali is a "neutral *****"? :lol:

    His quitting is not indivative of his being a ***** because he later protested a stoppage/fought on after being punched.

    Liston is a ***** because he quit having previously fought on with a broken jaw/fought on after being punched.

    Reads like a HUGE double-standard, doesn't it?
     
  3. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    If you think that Liston/Williams was a war on the level of, or that it entailed anywhere near the kind of adversity seen in, Lewis/Klitschko, I'd advise you to look again. Liston took a few decent combinations but nothing spectacular.

    Am I a "neutral *****"? When there's no evidence (or conflicting evidence), there's nothing to say.

    Are you even reading my posts? I explicitly said that the Lewis fight is not indicative of his being a ***** not because "he later protested a stoppage" but because he fought through a war.

    Sustaining a broken jaw in a fight you are winning and will win easily and going on is not overcoming the kind of adversity that sustaining a virtually collapsed eye socket and monstrous gash across your face in a fight that could have gone either way and saw the heaviest slugging in the last decade of boxing is. Vitali had much more adversity to face, even if Liston may have been in a comparable amount of pain.

    Remember, "*****" is still in a relativized sense.

    And stop distorting what I said, McGrain, mate!
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    That's trademarked, I should get royalties for this.
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I love how Liston is getting torn a new ******* in these last few weeks. :lol:

    His fans are getting a well needed dosage of reality. I'm starting to see an almost Tyson 86-88 type pattern with Liston fans and Liston's prime from a few posters in this thread. I blame Chuck Wepner. :lol:
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007

    Yes, luckily for your heart i've added that to the post since you quoted this post.


    Your definition of a "war" is a short fight where the fighter gets hit. That's ok by me. But is it that different from Lison-Williams I? I don't think you can say "Vitali's loss against Lewis excuses his quit job because he was in a hard fight later - but Liston's fight with Williams doesn't excuse his quit job because I say so".

    Williams hit Liston hard and often, certainly MORE than Lewis landed on Vitali across the five rounds those two contested. If you don't want to count both fights, the numbers are still comparable. Lewis landed the harder shots, I should think, and certainly landed THE hardest shot. But at the time of the stoppage Vitali was winning. He was really hurt only once.

    You seem to be wiping off one guys ***** :)lol:) but leaving the other guys ***** untouched because it suits you. Certainly I don't see the massive difference between the punches Liston sucks up and the punches Vitali sucked up whilst winning the majority of his rounds with Lewis.


    Firstly, how utterly ridiculous. Boxing with a broken jaw for 4 rounds plus isn't overcoming adversity to the same extent as boxing a couple of rounds with a very bad cut? Are you stupid?

    Secondly, Liston lost the fight he broke his jaw in, genius. He got hit in the head repeatedly on the way to that loss.

    Finally, this is preposterous because Vitali did NOT "overcome" it, at all. This is another example of your double standard. You are giving Vitali credit for overcoming adversity he did not overcome.

    And yet you hysterically protest when you are accused of giving him credit for protesting the stoppage. Strange.

    :lol: What adversity? Shouting at the referee when he stopped the fight, preventing him from facing the ADVERSITY of fighting on with such a bad cut??
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007
    You are actually takling about me...again.


    You are a strange little man and no mistake.

    I absoltuely loved your Green-Ward pick by the way. You "had a feeling" that Green was going to win because he "looked confident" :lol: There are so many of your kind in general it's incredible. Bet you'd never actually seen Green box, had you? Maybe Miranda on YouTube?

    Love it. I bet you managed to score Green a round or rounds, didn't you?
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about my trademarks.

    :lol:

    I ****ing love, absolutely love that you did this. AND I Knew in typical McGrain fashion that you would come here talking about how I picked Green. I didn't ****ing pick Green. Find me a quote where I picked Green or thought he was going to win. If not (Which you can't), then shut the **** up. My suspicion had more to do with not being sold on Ward than Green. I also thought the fight would be on the outside a lot more then it was. I didn't even make a ****ing pick. Unlike you, you don't say jack **** about anything in general. Obviously because you don't to ever get ripped on or you care too much about your status. I've never ever seen you ever go out a limb ever.

    I saw Green against Simms in his last fight and wasn't very impressed. I thought he would bring more, and my comments were partly emotional, partly not thinking Ward would play the role of Joe Frazier for 12 rounds. Like I said before, more on not being sold on Ward than Green. Obviously I am now.

    And don't even talk to me about scoring fights.

    Thank for actually bringing this up. Further proves you not acknowledge and read my posts but verifies that you love to try distorting the **** out of things for your own benefit. I knew you would do this, it's not unlike you. You're clearly more obsessed about me. Quite funny. So obsessed you have to get present things wrong just to spite me.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007

    Here you go:

    Link:
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7089645&postcount=2

    No doubt this will now, not really mean that you were picking him...but that you just had a suspcicion that he was going to win...which is different how?



    Here is my detailed pick for Ward. It contains more detail than any post you have ever made:

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=24197&more=1

    Now, you.

    How the **** is "i have a sneaking suspicion that Green is going to upset Ward" not a pick? Of COURSE it's a pick. A terrible one.

    That makes you a better poster but a worst analyst. I like that better!


    Did you score Green a round or not? I bet you did. Furthermore I bet it was one or two when you were still trying to kid yourself your pick could be right.
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    A sneaking suspicion is not a pick. It's a gut feeling at best. My official pick was been Ward decision, but I didn't bother posting about it as just about everyone thought he was going to win.

    :lol: Congratulations on picking Ward. And all the details in the world doesn't matter when you get it as wrong as you can. I wouldn't brag about that... Green will bring the fight to Ward, Ward will stop Green.

    ]quote]Now, you.

    How the **** is "i have a sneaking suspicion that Green is going to upset Ward" not a pick? Of COURSE it's a pick. A terrible one. [/quote]

    :lol: Are you ****ing kidding me? A sneaking suspicion is a sneaking suspicion? Where's the ****ing belief in that. It's not a pick, I didn't pick Green. If I had you would've known because I'm not afraid to against the grain and I'm bold, unlike you. I just felt better about Green's chances than most did, which I was obviously wrong on (AS you are about Green getting stopped and bringing the fight to Ward).

    Actually, I would be the better analyst. You are the more knowledgeable.

    1. I score fights better than you.

    2. I scored round 1 10-10 although scoring it for Green is not unrealistic. Green jabbed and moved forward while Ward was taking his time and patiently finding a rhythm.



    If you want to go prediction against prediction, analysis against analysis we can do that all day. Of course, you're going to falsely distort evidence but that's fine. I'd love to see all your picks along with your betting account cash.

    But basically, if you had any honor you would shut the **** out. As I never said Green would win, didn't say I thought Green would win. A sneaking suspicion is a pick in your mind. :lol:
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I think that Green has an edge in strength, edge enough to make any sojourn to the inside very uncomfortable for Ward. Although he looks a good infighter, I don’t think that is the range the WBA super-middleweight champion will enjoy fighting at.

    LOL. Loving this analysis.

    I think Ward will look to stay outside and box, flashing leads in with either hand from either stance. If Green feels he is being out-jabbed, which is something I expect to see, his ability to close the distance on Ward becomes paramount. Is it something he can do?


    Could he get it more wrong in his analysis? This is what he was bragging about.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol::lol: of course it is!! If you say "I have a sneaking suspicion that x is going to beat y" you've picked x!

    :rofl:rofl

    You made a secret pick but didn't post it! Lovely. That reallly is sweet.


    Actually:

    The article is completely clear. The manner of the victory will be decided by the ambition of Green. He showed none.




    Yep, but you sure don't call em better.

    But yeah, you do the objective job of scoring fights "better" than me. Christ alive :lol:

    :lol:

    You ****ing liar. Quote:


    Link:
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7113762&postcount=94

    How many lies you gonna get caught in today?

    Absolutley not. I'm looking to get less, not more involved with you. You are a crazy person.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,056
    Mar 21, 2007

    Are you really, after admitting to a "sneaking suspicion" to Green upsetting Ward, complianing about my analysis of that fight? Here are some sections you are not cherry-picking:


    I don’t think that Green can out-jab Ward for any length of time. Additionally, as the fight roles on and Ward gets into his rhythm-breaking groove, Green may struggle to land this punch more and more. This means he has to do one of two things, refuse the invitation to jab by taking the fight inside or give up that ground, those points, and try for the knockout.




    Ward will control the range in this fight, clinching and working inside when the two come together, waiting for the referee to separate them.



    If Green shows the defensive lapses he did in that fight he will have serious trouble, not so much because he can be knocked out with one punch, but because Ward will break him down badly across multiple rounds. Kessler is a durable opponent and proved it against Calzaghe, but by the end of his fight with Ward, Kessler looked like he had been mauled by a dog, bleeding from multiple cuts to his eyes and from his mouth. This was success born of consistency in accuracy married to good power.



    Not Shakespeare perhaps, but certainly much better than, "I have a sneaking suspicion that Ward will upset Green" (whatever it means - apparently something differnt to actually thinking Green will win).
     
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    That's why I still thought Ward would win. Ward's my pick, but I fancied Green's chances. It's not a pick you buffoon. You've never had any conflicted thoughts in a fight? It's like a percentage game. If I had thought Green would win I would've said something more powerful than sneaking suspicion. Hell I would've picked him.

    To the point of almost betting the rest of my Vcash to ledger a Ward decision. But I don't care about Vcash, I just mess around and try hitting the big win.


    You thought Ward would fight on the outside and control distance. He fought directly at Green pushing him back. You said Green was too strong and that he would trouble Ward inside. That's absolutely 100% wrong.

    Based on what. You think I picked Paulie over Khan :lol: No wonder you think that.

    You don't have the right to call anyone a liar.

    I scored round 1 a draw but I could see how you could give it to Green.

    I wouldn't give the first round to Ward. It would be a draw or 10-9 for Green. Wasn't a shutout.

    Of course not. That's what you can't keep the topics related to the subject. You have to talk about me, or how I'm talking about you (When I'm not), and then talk about how my picks are funny when I never made those picks. You're a lieing, manipulative, distorter of reality. You care more about your status here, and how you're percieve than actually posting and learning about a sport. You care more about my posts, and talking about me rather than the topics at hand. You've never been bold, never shown an adequate ability to break fights down or predict them correctly. Never gone against the grain. You can only harp on cheap points like my joking about picking Paulie over Khan or trying to create a reality that doesn't exist (Like me picking Green to win).

    The only thing crazy is being disturbed about me talking about, then changing subjects only to talk about me. Strange.
     
  15. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Yet still got my prediction closer. Ward hardly had to control range as Green was frozen on the inside. Ward didn't let the ref separated, Green held and wanted that. Completely off.

    Yes, your last paragraph talks about Ward having the power to stop Green. Green was beaten up, but never in danger of being stopped or worn down.

    Truly Nostradamus. Really compares to my analysis of Clottey shelling up against Pac refusing to engage to try and win. That's a fight everyone knew who would win, like this one... but at least I'm specifically right or bold about how a fight will take place.