Soooo we have it..pac only agreed to a 7 day cutoff

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sdsfinest22, Oct 24, 2010.


  1. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Pacman and his team told on themselves. I had a feeling it was not a Random drug test up until the fight they agreed too.
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    pac didnt want it...7 days ...HE LIED..HE SAID HE AGREED UP UNTIL...OR KONCZ LIED

    TEAM PAC DOES NOT WANT THE FLOYD FIGHT AT THIS POINT...

    I CAN JUST AS EASILY SAY THEY KNEW BY OFFERING 7 THAT FLOYD WOULDN'T TAKE IT ANYWAYS AS HE HAD ALREADY PUT IT OUT ON PPV THAT HE WANTED UP UNTIL THE DAY OF//

    NEXT
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Lmfao..just read all 17 pages...*******s getting owned....they keep bringing up vacation..

    Guess what though..even if floyd wasn't on vacation pac still didn't agree period....

    And we got conflicting info from team pac.

    Floyd has stuck with his story the entire time..up until the day of..

    No where after the mosley fight did he say anything about 7 days.


    Deal *******s...

    Pac-"we'll test anytime, any day, any where."

    koncz- "we agreed to everything up to 7 days"

    either koncz or pac is lying...either way someone lying

    quit trying to beat around that *******s...bringing up what floyd did has **** to do with this..

    Stay on topic *******s dont get off cuz ur boi's team got caught up again..

    Only thing that gonna make this right is if the interviews were held at completely different times..

    Source on the dates of em anyone???
     
  4. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    Probably the reason it stopped being an issue for him. Remember during the second negotiation Floyd isn't concerned with the OSDT anymore. Only the fans here at ESB is making it an issue.
     
  5. Bystander

    Bystander Sensible Kibitzer Full Member

    552
    0
    Apr 2, 2008
    i've got 5 points for you...


    first off, a 7-day cutoff would definitely cover and detect all peds. don't try to show your ignorance around here.:lol:

    second, pac didn't categorically say that he agreed up until the day of the fight.

    third, your idol duckie boy didn't agree now deny with pac's statement because he was busy battering his wife and having a vacation at the same time.

    fourth, what's there to discuss about when your rubber duckie doesn't have the "urge", is nowhere to be found these days and might probably end up getting married behind bars.

    and fifth, you are getting owned on your own thread so i suggest you temporarily log out and go back when your idol ***-*** gayfeather finds his longlost urge and finally decides to make a fight with the asian midget. :good



    P.S. no use in replying to my post because i won't be able to read it and reply back anyways coz i'm logging off! :hi:
     
  6. Sunchild78

    Sunchild78 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,721
    50
    Sep 25, 2009
    I don't understand if this dude is suppost to be so great, why not agree to the full terms of the testing? Floyd agree to his terms with the 10 mill per pound over weight. Never in boxing have there been such a demand from one boxer to another, but no matter how ridiculous it was Floyd AGREED. Floyd made a demand and all of a sudden Floyd is the bad guy. The fight have not happen yet because Pac won't agree to the terms people, not some of it, but all of it. It looks like someone really don't want this fight.
     
  7. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    I've got one word for you...


    "URGE"
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    thats all very nice...you were off on your second point though...:hi: pac told Marley he agreed up until the day of...U *******S JUMPED ALL OVER IT..

    NOBODY TALKIN ABOUT WHAT FLOYD SAID..

    NEXT ONE..:deal:hi:
     
  9. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    :rofl:rofl:rofl THEY KEEP DOING IT..FUKIN *******S GOT NO LOGIC:bart:nut

    URGE AND VACATION..YEA THATS NICE...TEAM PAC LYING AGAIN:hi:
     
  10. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    so you're saying floyd lied about the urge thing too? :lol:
     
  11. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Pac got caught lying again. LOL
     
  12. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    and floyd is still missing in action. lol!
     
  13. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    Search warrants and a cut off date to a very out of the norm demand are COMPLETELY different situations. A 7, 14 or 30 day cut off is fine to catch someone doping with EPOs or PEDs....especially when the most important blood test happens IMMEDIATELY following the fight.

    I know that the organization who Floyd hired to handle the testing protocol would have authority when and where the test took place. Which of course was USADA. But Floyd had his requirements that he took to USADA and they adhered to his request and they worked up testing measures based on Olympic style testing, but conformed to meet their clients needs. I'm not saying the testing isn't any good. It's better than what they have right now....but it's FLOYD's BABY! He created and breathed life into this circus and he expected everyone to lay down for him easily. That didn't happen and that was more than enough to give Floyd a way out of the fight.

    A cut off date can still hold the "RANDOM" element. Just b/c you know when the cut off date is doesn't mean you know when they'll be testing. EVERY TEST has a CUT OFF DATE BRO. When that date is depends on who's taking the tests and who demanded them.

    PAC's not the only great who fought for a title at a catch weight. Sugar Ray Leonard and other greats have done so in the past.
     
  14. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    If an organization like the USADA is gonna do testing based on the FOUNDATION of thier current testing measures then NO outside party/client should be allowed to have input in CHANGING their standards just to meet their clients needs.

    Roach is on record saying a lot of stuff about PAC's opponents....Being shot, weight drained, Old, can't pull the trigger. Bottom line you know boxing is just as much mental as it is physical. Some say the mental aspect holds mroe value when its all said and done. If a fighter is weight drained b/c of 2 lbs...then they are weight drained for their current weight requirments. And as a man and a professional you should know your limits. None of PAC's opponents have used that they were weight drained as a reason they failed to win. NONE of them. Except for Erik Morales in the rematch.

    Cotto and Marg was not and will not be weight drained. But it's a very common excuse that FANS of the losing side uses to rationalize why PAC continues to prove why he's the best fighter in boxing P4P. At some point PAC will get the credit he deserves but like all Greats.....they are never appreciated until they hang up them gloves for real.
     
  15. randomwalk

    randomwalk Active Member Full Member

    1,035
    0
    Feb 25, 2010
    who cares? this fight ain't happening. i think this is pac's last fight.