Soooo we have it..pac only agreed to a 7 day cutoff

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sdsfinest22, Oct 24, 2010.


  1. bollocks

    bollocks Active Member Full Member

    915
    2
    Nov 20, 2009
    We will never know the truth because both side are lying to fit their own agenda.

    In an article written by Marley and one by Pac himself, they that agreed to testing up to the day of the fight. Koncz said up to 7 days before the fight. Who do we believe more, Koncz or Pac?

    Floyd and Ellerbe said that no negotiations took place. Greenburg claimed otherwise. Who do we believe more, Floyd or Greenburg?

    I suppose what you will think as fact is whichever side you believe in.
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKts6C7IbBY[/ame]

    JUST WATCH THE FIRST PART...SEE KONCZ INTERVIEW

    "WE PRETTY MUCH AGREED TO ANYTHING ON THE DRUG TESTING, ACCEPT NOT WITHIN 7 DAYS"
     
  3. empiricix

    empiricix Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Nov 15, 2009

    Look at you trying to ignore my response after I owned your sorry ass. :tired

    LOL at a ***** crying about getting "conflicting information"! :rofl

    Where was your outrage when Floyd and Ellerbee denied that there was a second negotiation, only to be owned by Greenburg? ...when Floyd showed a $100M contract being offered to him? ...when Floyd announced his next fight this year in Dubai? ...when he denied beating up his baby mama?

    Talk about OWNAGE!!!:nut
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Greenburg of course..and yes i do think negotiations took place and i do think team mayweather is lying about that...

    but ive debated that in many threads...this one isnt about all that..im not saying **** about team mayweather..im saying **** about team pac lying and being caught right now..

    put it how ya want to...but the info is conflicting for team pac
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    :blabla:blabla:readthre:

    MAN R U STUPID? LOOK AT THE THREAD TOPIC FUKIN IDIOT..WE NOT IN A "WHAT TEAM FLOYD SAID" THREAD

    We in a TEAM PAC GAVE CONFLICTING INFO THREAD DUMMY

    IVE DEBATED THAT MANY TIMES IN OTHER THREADS WHERE THAT'S THE TOPIC BUT I CHOOSE TO STAY ON THREAD TOPIC UNLIKE YOURSELF..


    LMFAO...CANT OWN ME WHEN I JUST SAID I AGREED WITH YOU DUMMY..

    FUKIN IDIOT...U OWNED URSELF..GO READ IT..DOES IT NOT SAY 'ILL AGREE WITH YOU"

    GET THE FUK OUT NEWBIE ..JUST BAN YOURSELF CUZ IM MAKIN U LOOK BAD:hi:
     
  6. empiricix

    empiricix Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    Let us assume for the sake of argument that you are right in that there is a discrepancy between what Pac stated earlier about agreeing to no-limit testing and Koncz's statement in 24/7 about only agreeing to a 7-day limit...

    Then Pac is a ****ing liar!

    Satisfied?

    Now, what does that make Floyd after all of the blatant lies he told this year?

    Hypocrites!
     
  7. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    HERE IS IT BIG ENOUGH FOR U? GET PAC'S CUM OFF YOUR EYE MAN....U CANT READ THE COMPUTER OR SOME ****:rofl:rofl:patsch
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007

    it is true though..see your trying to argue that it isn't true..it is.. THERE IS NO DISCREPANCY...IT IS WHAT IT IS MAN...LIKE IT OR NOT...THEY LIED

    Do u want the link to the article? I can provide sources...i have already actually..

    Your still trying to argue them though...thus why we always say *******s are not logical so u cant debate with em...
     
  9. empiricix

    empiricix Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Nov 15, 2009

    LOL at a ***** playing the newbie card when he gets owned!!!:yep

    The fact is that this is a bitching thread started by a ***** to make Pacquiao look bad in the hopes of salvaging whatever small credibility that your boy has.

    "See, mom? Pac told a lie! He's as bad as Floyd! Or maybe, Floyd isn't that bad at all."

    Even fools can readily see through your tactics.
     
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    LMFAO...OK:!:

    LMFAO ..U BEEN OWNED MAN...ALL I DID WAS PRESENT VALID INFO FOR YOU AND LOOK HOW MAD U GETTING:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    IT DOES MAKE HIM LOOK BAD THOUGH..THATS WHAT YOU DONT GET...

    THE FACT THAT HE LIED OR HIS ADVISER LIED MAKES TEAM PACQUIAO LOOK BAD..NOT AS A PERSON...

    LMFAO...THIS GUY GOT RIDICULOUSLY OWNED....LMFAO...N U CANT "OWN ME" WHEN U WAY OFF THREAD TOPIC IDIOT...WHAT U SAID HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING I WAS DEBATING FUKIN DUMMY:patsch

    BELL HAS RUNG AND U JUST BEEN LET OUT OF SCHOOL:deal:hi:
     
  11. empiricix

    empiricix Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Nov 15, 2009

    Actually, when one states "for the sake of argument", this does not really constitute actual acknowledgment of a fact, merely a token concession for the purpose of exploring an avenue of discussion. So, when you say this, and then follow it up with "No denying the facts", then it is a contradiction. A common error of those not well-versed in intellectual discourse.
     
  12. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    You're a ****ing moron SD. No possible way he could cheat with 7 day cutoff. The last week is light working anyways, why would he use anything like EPO during the final week? You goddamn *****s are pathetic , you should go on vacation like your man crush
     
  13. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    The 7 day cut off could be a compromise reached on the second round of negotiations. From 24 days to 14, to 7 days that is a big compromise on team Pac.

    Here's my take on what happened. On the 2nd negotiations Team Pac came to the table with 14 days, team Mayweather represented by GBP came with up to the fight. Then Pac compromised to 7 days and GBP accepted. This is perhaps what they mean on agreeing although the contract as a whole wasn't accepted by Mayweather for some other reasons.

    Everything will be clear by May next year. When that time comes I'll know who to blame if the fight doesn't push through.
     
  14. empiricix

    empiricix Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    Nov 15, 2009

    Who's mad? I didn't call you an idiot, did I? :D

    I'll leave you now to your delusions of victory. You deserve it after remaining one of the most vociferous apologists for Floyd, which isn't an easy thing to do after all the disappointments that he's given his fans. However, let me just point out that anyone reading this thread can judge for themselves who had been truly owned.

    Ciao!:hi:
     
  15. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    Manny Pacquiao is a politician. Are you people really claiming he's an honest man?!?!? Do I need to throw out a few 'honest politician' cliches?