Sooooo.....Does Carl Froch have a better resume than Joe Calzaghe????

Very objective subject and depends how you rate both guys wins over particular opponents at different times in there careers.... if that makes sense.

 

Hence why I never put Reid as one of Froch's best opponents. :good

 

You are confused.

 

very

 

Calzaghe of course,
years from now people will see froch resume consist of dirrell and taylor, but calzaghe's resume will have Royjones jr and bernard hopkins, fights he won in the US and coming back from being knocked down, its close but calzage will always be 1 above froch! Besides Froch will lose against andre ward which will belittle his resume slightly

 

shocked at the poll results tbh. froch has been much more consistent and done much more including fighting out of his comfort zone.

but calzaghe beat both lacy and kessler when they were considered best in the division. froch has never beaten the best in the division.

calzaghe's win over lacy and kessler eclipse anything froch has achieved thus far.

 

Definetly better Resume although Calzaghe beats Froch head to head 10 times outa 10.

 

:good

 

He can eventually but I think Calzaghe beating Hopkins(debatable but a W is a W), prime Kessler, and Eubank puts his resume above Froch's. Calzaghe was the better boxer but I think that Froch has more willingness to fight the best. I prefer Froch but I have to admit that Calz' resume is better.

 

either way, it's sad.