Sorry, But History Says Vitali Klitschko Will Lose

You're a moron. This is you, same guy who says Floyd mayweather would lose to anyone in the top 10 at WW :nut
and your signature is ****ing ******ed.

 

Not many have their comebacks against talentless, fat sluggers like Peter.

 

It's been done in other weight classes and there's always a first to everything...

 

Klitschko wins - bet your mutual fund on it...

 

This is Sam Peter. History be damned, he cannot win this fight.

 

Jefferies had to lose 100 pounds

Ali already had the beginning stages of parkinsons not to mention he had to lose a lot of weight

Holmes again had to lose a lot of weight in a short period of time

See a common denominator here? Klitschko does not abuse or let himself turn into a fat slob.

the other guys were fighting ELITE fighters for the Championship in Johnson, Tyson, Holmes etc.

Vitali is fighting Sam Peter who has no skill. The only thing that is true here is Klitschko was away 4 years. You are not comparing apples with apples.

 

the poster does have a good point about the huge absence Vitali has taken away from boxing but at the same time he is not coming back against Jack Johnson, Larry Holmes or Mike Tyson.

I personally believe this is a pick em fight that will all come down to conditioning and dirty tactics

 

And how many times were statistics wrong?

 

But history also shows that Shitali beats overweight fighters who aren't ATGs (Lewis), and there's a decent chance that Peter will be overweight.

 

so is your response.

stop being a ***** and put yourself on the line.

i really hate lame dick cheapshots like this from people who can't do any better.

EDIT: by the way i agree with the floyd welter argument but if you can't reply to someone better than that you don't deserve a response.

 

that was my first thought exactly.

we're not talking about a high profile champion who will be remembered - peter is a powerhouse who has yet to prove himself and is seen as limited.

 

You're a newbie anyway, no one cares if you post again. Furthermore, the bookies know way better than you who the favorite is, and that is Vitali.

 

First of all Vladimir Virchis was never the world champion so that is meaningless.

Secondly all of those previous fighters were formerly the best heavyweight champion taking on the best heavyweight in the world at that time.

Vitali was considered the best heavyweight champion when he retired and he is fighting Sam Peter not his brother Wlad.

In previous times Sam Peter would be considered a contender not a champion. So in reality we have someone who used to be the best heavyweight in the world coming back to fight a top heavyweight contender in his first fight.

The only time in history that that has ever happened was when Ali came back after 3 years and 7 months against top contender Quarry and KOed his ass. Vitali is fighting Peter after 3 years and 10 months of retirement.

Sorry but history says that Ali has already done that and won in the only time that it has ever been attempted by a heavyweight. History is actually on Vitali's side.:deal

 

History is irrelevant here. There's only one Scam Cheater.