Sorry, But History Says Vitali Klitschko Will Lose

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brian123, Oct 6, 2008.


  1. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    It has a lot to do with the 2 fighters. We're talking about an average heavyweight champion with one knockout over a top 25 fighter versus a decent champion with a 92 percent KO percentage.
     
  2. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Fact is, no one is absolutely sure how Vitali is going to look after all this time. Not even Vitali. That's what makes this fight so interesting. If this fight takes place with a prime Vitali, no one cares...easy blowout win for Vitali.

    I don't think that Vitali Klitschko would comeback and challenge the current WBC title holder if he felt he couldn't perform at an appropriate level. The Klitschko's have too much pride for mediocrity.

    Vitali KO in 4
     
  3. Matt

    Matt Member Full Member

    329
    3
    Feb 18, 2007
    In comparable history, if Sam Peter was as good as
    A) Jack Johnson in his prime
    B) Ezzard Charles in his prime (maybe little after it)
    C) Larry Holmes in his prime
    D) Mike Tyson in his prime,

    this may be a good comparison in general. However, imo all of the above were in good shape when those you mentioned came back from retirement, and alot better than Sam Peter. So I think Vitali has a much better chance than the others you mentioned.
     
  4. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Just make sure you bring your ass back here when Peter's sorry fat one is schooled...
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Floyd would lose to any top 10 welter.
     
  6. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    The word "maybe" worries me the most :roll:
     
  7. Seven Chance

    Seven Chance Augustus Style Journeyman Full Member

    1,626
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    The thing about Jack Johnson, Ezzard Chales, Larry Homles, and Mike Tyson is they're all all time greats. Sam Peter is a pugy "slugger" without any meaningful KO's against top tier opponents. Consider him the Kimbo Slice of pro boxing.
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    :rofl :lol: :rofl :lol:

    I just ****i'n hope you're right. That long layoff is really bothering me. I'm picking Vit but I'm not that confident and comfortable. :yep
     
  9. trac209

    trac209 Active Member Full Member

    1,129
    0
    Dec 12, 2004
    sorry but it won't happen vitali in 7
     
  10. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    So you think that "Fat Boy, Cant Box A Lick" Sam Peter will win.
    Or should I say "The Human Heavybag, Einstein" Sam Peter.
    It doesnt really matter.
    Sam Peter is na embarrassing example of what the heavyweight champion of the world should be.
    There are atleast a dozen other heavyweight contenders who would whip his ass with little difficulty.
    James McCline beat him and got burned by the decision.
    Plus he is a bully and has a big mouth.
    Guys that have to talk about how tough they are usually are not that tough.
    They are just trying to convince themselves that they are.
    Fianlly this Saturday we will witness what a "Tomato Can" Sam Peter really is.
     
  11. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
    No my friend, I said Floyd never fought a top ten ranked welterweight and he NEVER did (wonder why though?).
     
  12. tylerrcurtis

    tylerrcurtis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    2
    Aug 15, 2008
    WHO NEX ahhh really...vitali ko4 sam peter is a fat slob
     
  13. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
    I hope so I am on record (see previous posts) as a huge Vitali fan! In his prime this would not even be a question to debate. I just wish he would have taken a shake-the-rust-off fight first.
     
  14. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Wasn't Baldomir at #1 when Mayweather fought him?
     
  15. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    This is absolutely true - and it is exactly what I have been saying since I heard the announcement of this fight.

    I have no argument with those who think Vitali can win this fight - it is those who think he should be the favorite, or that it is a foregone conclusion, who are way off the mark.

    ALL the variables affecting the outcome of the fight work in Peter's favor, with the possible exception of skill - assuming Vitali has retained the level of ability he had FOUR years ago, which is highly doubtful.

    In sum, I will be shocked if Vitali wins this fight. As you point out, all of boxing history would suggest it is unlikely - very unlikely.