sorry calzaghe your resume is weakest ever.

f****** hell i'm honoured.your now becoming as obsessed with dissing me as you are with joe:good

 

PACFAN keeps digging his hole, someone throw him a rope!

 

Look, I'm bored of skirting around the issue and picking up on bull**** semantics. I thought you'd have an idea, because the people that can spend 15 pages debating a topic usually have a fair interest in the sport and know their own lists, even if its rough.

The rationale isn't a particularly difficult one, if you can conclusively state Calzaghe's resume is not top 100 standard you must have a fair idea of the sort of guys you are comparing it against? Otherwise its a completely general statement that is not backed up with the reasoned arguments you claim to have.

The reason I spend my time responding to you is I think you have it in you to provide a decent argument, and justify why you think his resume is not better than other guys in the top 100. So have a think about it and get back to me, otherwise there is not much point continuing because your ideology of what consitutes a reasoned argument is completely different to mine.

 

Nah, smoking you with the aid of Sugar Ray will be just fine

:smoke :smoke :smoke

 

My friend it is without doubt you who are being highly illogical. You have repeatedly asked me to give you a 90-100 of my top 100 boxers. I cannot give one as I have not written out a 100. I can make an informed estimate at who and wouldn't make that 100 if I did make one, but if I gave you ten names for my 90-100, without having established concretely the 1-90, it would be worthless. I can make an estimate of who would and wouldn't make the 100 because I have a vague idea of what a top 100 would be (as I said, Mike McCallum was #79 on The Ring Top 80 of Last 80 Years and I would have him above Joe Cal, and that doesn't take into account boxers from over 80 years ago, and I personally have Calzaghe around 15th in my ratings of the last 15-20 years- so that would INDICATE I wouldn't have Calzaghe in my top 100, but I can't say with certainty he wouldn't be as I haven't written one. He may make it in, but I don't think so). You seem to think it is logical and would be of value for me to guess at ten names that I think would be around 90-100 if I wrote a list, without writing the list. If you want me to give you ten names I will do so, but I don't see the point in it myself.

As you can see, I do have a fair idea and that was why I made the statement, but a fair idea is NOT the same as asking for a concrete ten names. You see?

 

jog on, your opinion has turned out to be another excuse to try and show your hatred against a boxer who probably beat one of your favourites, jog on.

 

That is all I was looking for. We've gone from "Calzaghe doesn't make a top 100" to "I can't be sure"

This is the problem when you make statements without actually thinking about it carefully. You usually find yourself having to backtrack.

 

Aaah the joy of the afterglow after having dragged out a pedantic semantic objection for pages and days, enjoy your Pyrrhic victory.

I do not think Joe Calzaghe would make my top 100 all-time pound-for-pound boxers, not due to his lack of talent, but due to his resume.

Happy now sir?

 

in your dreams bonny lad.your rigidity,intransigence,and clear agenda on the subject matter renders you devoid of any credibility.:hi:

 

Argue with Sugar Ray chump, it's his opinion you called preposterous

:hi: :hi: :hi: :smoke :smoke :smoke :hi: :hi: :hi:

 

Bull**** anti Calzaghe thread no. 377822.

Face it kids, whether you like him or not he is very very good.

 

Ability wise, yes he is indeed. He does not have a strong resume though. Hence this threaddddd....

 

you are proving to be a very silly poster. your best mate sugar ray just made a general comment it was no big deal,he was praising calzaghe not dissing him junior.

 

I know he was praising Calzaghe, the point is not about Joe, it's about you calling a boxing opinion held by Sugar Ray Leonard 'preposterous'. I believe the chances are more likely your boxing opinion is preposterous than that of Sugar Ray Leonard (a big Calzaghe fan).

Accept you were owned fella :smoke

 

dream on junior.once again your just showing your immaturity and silliness.if it was any big deal to sugar ray and he felt strongly that calzaghe was ducking whoever,he would have simply dissed him,he was just talking generally about what fights he would like to see.
your argument and silly list of fighters joe "should have called out" is just the type of dross that huggers and haters get involved in.i'm sure if i was sad enough to go back over pacs career at the top and look at all the top fighters who fought say 2 weights both above and below him i could come up with several names who pac "never called out." it's just plain immature shite from a very silly discredited litte poster. enjoy your weekend at the play park junior.:hi: