"Sorry, thats all we've got time for"

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Bob Latchford, Dec 5, 2009.


  1. Bob Latchford

    Bob Latchford New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Nov 30, 2009
    Why, what else is scheduled on Sky Box Office Dave?

    The main event lasted 76 seconds, they spent 20 minutes off the air with a "technical error" why could they not show a couple more of the fights on the undercard?
     
  2. GoatySimpson

    GoatySimpson Active Member Full Member

    698
    2
    May 13, 2009
    I know it's digusting really. They could have shown more. My signal was shite early on as well couldn't record on sky plus and watch the fight. Bloody pirates these lot.
     
  3. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    Somehow they predicted beforehand that the fight would be over in under 2 minutes.
     
  4. topdog88

    topdog88 frohaye Full Member

    536
    1
    Jun 18, 2009
    shocking really, did they show frankie gavin then i only started watching when motchell vs prescott was on....he boxed well though!
     
  5. gasman

    gasman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,159
    4
    May 16, 2009
    I agree - it was total bollocks - shite coverage
     
  6. felix

    felix Active Member Full Member

    840
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    They do this everytime the pricks.
     
  7. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Very poor show indeed, Khan fight could have gone an hour, that's all they had time for, my arse.
     
  8. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    I'm disgusted by Sky. Why do people pay £15 for them to show us parts of the olympians. I don't remeber seeing Arthur v Wright or Enzo. A load of bollocks.

    Sky disgust me.

    Like I said before, too many names on the card. Less name, better fights, plus a better order of fights.
     
  9. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    You must be mad, they're robbing you lot blind. Never pay for box office, its the principle.
     
  10. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    Tonight i've basically came to the conclusion that i won't pay to watch Khan fight until he meets a world class fighter in there prime. He done well tonight but it's not worth £15. The undercard was decent tonight but sky ruined it...but we all know better by now....sky always do this. I won't pay for Haye-Ruiz...i will pay for PBF-Pacquaio but that will be it for me.
     
  11. abzmanc

    abzmanc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    0
    Jan 15, 2009
    Disgrace, any chance of clawing some money back after their 'Technical Fault'???
     
  12. anjawnaymiz

    anjawnaymiz Can we get Ivan Dychko some momentum Full Member

    8,263
    6,072
    Sep 6, 2008
    disgrace! technical fault and they didnt show arthur and enzo? farkin horse****!
     
  13. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    Yup, no Arthur, no Enzo & only short highlights of the olympic boys.(although Im happy Arthur didnt get shown now;))

    Pretty bad from SKY. & whats with ads during the fights on their PPV nowadays? I remember not so long ago when you purchased a PPV fight, they didnt have ads between the rounds. Now they dont give a **** & bombard you with ads in between rounds:twisted: & to think you have to pay through the nose for this ****...
     
  14. safe_pa

    safe_pa Howlin' Mad Full Member

    1,919
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    That is what really pissed me off. I think that sky having adverts is cheeky as ****. I want to hear whats being said by the seconds during the round break.
     
  15. My Dad, comedy genius, but actually genuinely angry whilst saying this;

    "James, I thought you said we'd get to see Tony Bellew if the Khan fight ended early, if we were paying for this I'd be fuming".

    Ungrateful chipped cable ****.