sounds like ****** wants no part of Burns-Broner

Am back n forth on it tbh, basically i wonder as to how well they would regulate it here.......and i would rather they grew natural bush/strain's than fire in bigbudxxx liquid feed etc (thats a major part of where i see weed/hash messing peoples heads mentally, the additives..........and of course.....the council brown diesel)

As i said befores, i been to Holland a fair bit over the years so i can see how it can work.....more reason for it to work than not to..........there concern is recovering tax profits i woulda thought......booze/weed.

Funnily enough ma dutch mates and there friends of friends dont smoke, maybe 2/10 do (hardly a comparison/example....but still)

Diageo released there oversee's profit regarding whisky two days ago and its £110 a second.........if i remember right.

As said, they are concerned about the booze hitting the wall (partialy) but oversea's distro is still massive.......and local purchase (UK) is only getting a bad name Ie.the offers from conglomerates etc.

Maybe cause am in Scotland and its pretty much an epedemic i hear about it more though.


Anyways, i could go on and on and.......

 

I get you, but yet again it goes to show prohibition is failing again.

Growers are growing an illegal plant and basically crop as soon as the plant has flowered enough to sell. They don't clean the plant out. If it were legal more growers would let the plants finish properly and flush the plant correctly. That's why if you ever have a sore throat after smoking it cos the plant has been cropped without cleaning plant of chemicals from nutrients.

That's hydroponics for you, the original cash cropping tool. If it were legal it'd be quality over quantity and more care would be taken i.e growing in soil with a proper flush hence organic crops that don't have any damaging chemicals stored in the plant matter.