Why is it that there are many converted orthodox fighters but not as many converted southpaw fighters? Wouldn't it be an advantage? I also saw recently some boxing analyst said most southpaws don't make it far in the pros except a few which I don't know how true this is. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Thanks
Yeah winky and haglar come to mind for converted southpaws to me @Charlie yeah thats what I thought and I conclude maybe he was just saying there was a lot less i'm not really sure
I'm also a right-handed southpaw . Huge advantage since I can throw my lead hand with power shots also
Ok, but can you throw your straight left with the same power as your straight right? I know for me, I'm almost more comfortable in a southpaw stance, but I lose a lot of power in my back hand. I'd think is common for righties who convert over.
I believe I could do either one but I have a strong right hand and believe I only would have an average straight left
:bbb When southpaws were rare there was a total lack of familiarity with the fighting style because there were no decent fighters to spare with who were lefties. Orthodox fighters, as a result, had serious trouble adequately preparing for the new angles/positions presented by southpaws and were at the mercy of that dreaded straight/lead left/right hook combo. Now with there being more lefties out there to spar with, the aura of mystery surrounding southpaws has disappeared and , thus, fewer people are converting to gain an advantage that no longer is as pronounced as it once was.:bbb