Spence and Crawford both destroying Pacquiao easily. Still Pac > Floyd.

I was aware, I just overestimate thurman. And underestimated the fact that this fight was not vada tested.

 

this is a very good example, to be honest.

 

I didnt know that froch fought and won to mayweather. Good to know, dude, thank you for the info.

 

Doesn't matter if they fought or not. Fact is if it happened Froch wins. See Mayweather fans and the concept of p4p just causes some disconnect with them.

 

thats why the good analysts take everything into account, cause results matter, not excuses.

 

sure man, whatever

 

Yes, you are right. I was not able to read that fight at all. Plus, it is happening to me a lot lately, I've read everything wrong in quite a good amount of fights lately. Too bad

EDIT: thanks god I NEVER bet. I would have lost everything this year.

 

i picked pac because of some of the things that you mentioned. even posted this pre fight, which i think is also happening like i foresaw.

i knew thurman was less than most people saw, so they would give manny more credit than deserved.

 

Yeah, but Sugar Ray was a special, generational talent and Thurman is no where near SRL's level. I don't think Thurman is the same fighter he was 3-4 years ago either. Combine the inactivity with the injuries and the fact that Thurman seems to prefer smoking bud and playing the didgeridoo in the woods, and I wouldn't be surprised if he retires soon and just disappears. He's a different breed.

 

Floyd broke both of his ankle she's done