But he faked an injury and pulled out against ancient 42 year old inactive Pac. He swerves prime Pac worse than he does Crawford.
Says you. Anyone with common sense knows Spence was legitimately hurt and pulled out because of it. The Spence of last night would've put the pac who fought ugas in the hospital. A prime pac couldn't beat a faded erik Morales. A prime pac folds under Spence's will.
Spence is the one who claimed that he had a very specific injury. Spence is the one who decided to post proof without actually posting proof. Guys who had real injuries — like Pac and Loma — had official statements from doctors. No proof is proof that Spence faked his injury.
You act like if you keep saying this bs over and over that it will somehow become true. It doesn't work like that. People aren't buying what you're saying here.
You like to think a prime Spence ducked an old Pac, but he didn't. Your hero is lucky Spence's eye got injured. Pac's last image in the ring would have been unconcious on the canvas.
Styles make fights. Ugas's shots had a clear impact on Spence and if he raised his output, he would have beaten Spence. The styles match up favored Pac whereas the styles matchup favored Ugas. And Keith Thurman hit Pac with massive shots to no effect. And what? You think Pac would just cover up and not punch back? You press Pac and you're in a world of trouble like Thurman was in rounds 1-6. Spence broke Ugas down because Ugas is a laid back low volume counterpuncher. Pac would be aggressively attacking Spence and history has shown that even very durable guys go into survival mode. It's very simple. There's no proof that Spence had a retina tear. Why are you so thick that you cannot comprehend this simple fact? But there was footage of a small southpaw lighting Spence up in sparring. Spence literally told us that he was depressed and having extreme difficulty with weight and that he brought in a nutritionist for Ugas. All signs point to Spence having a bad camp with weight. Deal with it.
LOL you claim Pac took monster shots from Thurman yet almost got kilked by Marquez. It's safe to say, Spence hits as hard as Marquez or harder. You claim no proof from an eye injury, where is the proof there wasn't? The burden of proof is on the accuser. You in fact are accusing Spence of lying, so prove it. What you provide is nothing but circumstantial. Nothing you say, which may be true, bad camp, depression etc, proves Spence was lying about his eye.
Spence v Welterwt Cotto is a good fight, and probably goes the distance. The version of Pac who dismantled Cotto, wins every round against Spence on the way to stopping him. Way too fast and way too much power.