bollocks that khan saying he didnt deliver there the ***** He won the last 2 rounds, the 3rd round he produced the netter quality gutted for the lad
jesus calm down, it was a close fight. Personally thought stalker edged it, but the mongolian was tagging him. no robbery, just a close fight. Not often i agree with amir khan
As a Brit I'm a little p*ssed Stalker lost (seeing as he is the home-fighter). You'd think Stalker would have got the nod due to him being on home soil in a close fight. The decision wasn't bad. The commentary are so awfully biased its annoying.
For me Close 1st but thought Mongolian edged by 1 Better round for the Mongolian, Good round from Stalker but stalker was being caught with counters Commentators didn't give the Mongol any credit for the work he was doing Gutted for Stalker though :-(
How can the judges have stalker up after the 1st, then he came on strong last 2 and still lost the fight?? he got the nod on the round imo he lost but the rounds he won imo the judges give it to the other fella. Just my opinion, and i dont know alot
Close fight, thought stalker nicked it but no robbery. Savanha Marshall did get robbed and nobody has metioned it just because she didn`t look as good as some expected and it was a poor fight
You have to legitimately win all of you're fights at the Olympics. I did not watch the fight by the way.
I thought stalker lost his first fight and was lucky to get the nod.however he clearly won this contest and lost!it must really confuse my friends that I try so hard to get them watchin boxing instead of footy.
**** off with this thread, the mongolian was the deserved winner close but deserved, far worse decision was freddie evans the other night even he couldnt believe it when he won