State of the P4P rankings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by demigawd, Apr 3, 2010.


  1. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I was just reviewing the Ring Magazine P4P rankings and was a little surprised to see it.

    1. Pac
    2. PBF
    3. Mosley
    4. Hopkins
    5. JMM
    6. Nonito Donaire
    7. Cotto
    8. Chad Dawson
    9. Paul Williams
    10. Caballero

    Mosley, other than his win over Margarito, hasn't been particularly impressive the past few years. Is his place deserved?

    Hopkins looked terrible tonight. Is his place deserved?

    Cotto and JMM both suffered losses of such magnitude that they looked well past their prime. Should they be on this list?

    Overall, most people on this list have suffered either losses in their last fight, or struggled mightily to win. Is this a reflection of there being a bad list, or is the problem deeper and the list is accurate and the talent is bad in this era?

    It seems to me a little of both. On one hand it looks like today's Ring P4P list is a reflection of historical greatness, almost as an honorary title rather than an accurate view into who the best fighters are in the world on a mythical "level" playing field. Would Mosley still be where he is on the list if we were hit with a memory ray and forgot everything about him prior to 2005? Would Hopkins? Would MAYWEATHER, for that matter?

    On the other hand, I'm not sure how many worthy candidates would be there to replace the ones who don't belong. I think our overall international talent pool has shallowed out a bit.

    I know there's a lot of debate about this, but I believe Heavyweights should be eligible for inclusion in P4P rankings and I think Wlad should be added to the list. Looking at current skillsets (that is, the fighter they ARE, not the fighter they were in their prime), why would Hopkins be deserving of #4 and Wlad not deserving of any ranking?

    I also think both the winner and the runner up of the super six tournament deserve a place on the top 10, especially if the winner goes undefeated throughout the tournament.

    I think, should Martinez win against Pavlik, that he should be there as well.

    I think Bradley deserves a spot because I think he's P4P AT LEAST as good as Chad Dawson.

    If Mosley loses to PBF, Martinez beats Pavlik, and Williams beats Cintron, I think the P4P rankings should look like this:

    1. Pac
    2. PBF
    3. Winner of S6 tournament if he went undefeated in the tournament
    4. Wlad Klit
    5. Tim Bradley or Winner of S6 tournament if he lost earlier during the tournament
    6. Chad Dawson
    7. Paul Williams (assuming he beats Cintron)
    8. Sergio Martinez
    9. Donaire
    10. Runner up of S6 tournament if he only lost once in the tournament, otherwise Lucian Bute

    Because there's a very real possibility that Martinez will lose, if he does, I would swap him with the runner up in the S6. I don't usually penalize unsuccessful moves up in weight too heavily which is why it would only cost Martinez one place. I made an exception to the penalization rule for JMM because he didn't look great even before the PBF fight. Where he places really depends on how he looks at the right weight for him. If he looks spectacular against a top opponent at his best weight, then there's room on my list for him again.

    What are your thoughts?
     
  2. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    Hopkins way too high, yours is better
     
  3. ashley

    ashley Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,140
    0
    Feb 14, 2007
    Maybe whoever wins the Donaire and Vic fight goes in at 5 to 8
     
  4. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    That's The Ring's P4P list, right? Yea, IMO their list is crap. Top 5 I don't have much problems with. Mosley, Hopkins, and JMM haven't done much of late, but what they have done resume wise they do deserve a place somewhere on everybody's P4P list. Donaire, Caballero, and Cotto I disagree with 100% especially, Donaire and Cotto. Donaire hasn't done ****, and Cotto hasn't been impressive of late. Alexander, Haye, Bradley, John, and Adamek should be in the top 10 or just outside of it. The talent is great, it doesn't have anything to do with this era, The Ring's P4P list is ****.
     
  5. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    Hopkins is going to go way down based on how he looked in the RJJ fight. JMM is probably on his way out (I think he only has 1 good fight left in him) and is still that high mostly because the ring isn't going to bounce him out of the ratings entirely based on a fight where he jumped two weight classes and took on one of the best fighters of a generation. Ditto for Cotto.

    It's really not that good a list, but whether you're talking boxing fans or organizations like the Ring they are often unwilling to drop fighters out of a top 10 list immediately, even if there's good reason to do so.
     
  6. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Vic dont belong anywere near that list.

    And for the guy that said Shane has been that impressive...Well he hasnt been losing fights. Vargas was impressive, Collazo was impressive. He lost a razor close dec to Cotto. Not bad and he has been at least as impressive as everyone on that list under him when you take into account who he has been fighting and who they have been fighting.
     
  7. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    Very good point here, since even if you don't look all that impressive you often get extra credit if you're winning against champions or legit challengers.
     
  8. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Who's the chick in your avatar??
     
  9. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    You're right on Cotto's case. He was badly beaten by Manny Pacquiao, but Juan Marquez; he was beaten but he was destroyed by Mayweather. Marquez was the top 2 P4P before Mayweather asked him to jump 2 weight classes to fight him. I think he deserves to stay on the rankings.
     
  10. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I give Mosley credit for Margarito and Collazo (even though he's a bit like Clottey in that he loses all of his big fights). But he lost to Cotto, didn't look great against Vargas the first time, looked pretty bad against Mayorga, and may very well lose to Mayweather. Not counting Mayweather, that doesn't strike me as a #3 P4P profile. If he loses to Mayweather, that will have put him at 1-2 in his last three and probably unworthy of being on the P4P top 10 anywhere.

    Thinking about it, IMO the current P4P list should only consider the last two years of a boxer's career. If a fighter retires, or his productivity or opponent selection suddenly drops within the last two years, then the fighter should no longer be on the list. This keeps the list relevant and filled with prime, peak performing fighters.

    So...who had the best past two years?
     
  11. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I spent a lot of time considering the case of JMM. I ultimately concluded that he was too high up on the list not because of Mayweather but because of the Diaz fight. He was in A LOT of trouble against a fighter who is just OK. I'm holding up his place until I see how he does once he's back in his weight class. Something tells me he won't be able to make lightweight, which would make him a jr. welter, which would be he's screwed. I don't think he can beat any of the top jr. welters. His camp flat out refused Khan. Just my gut on this.
     
  12. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    Claudia Lynx. Anybody know who the chick is in Babality's av?
     
  13. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    No that would make Shane 2-1 in his last three with the lost coming to the best fighter in the world. should he lost to Floyd. shane is 5-1 in his last six fights with 4 KO's. Not bad when you think he fought Margo, Mayorga, Vargas, cotto and Collazo.

    As far as looking bad vs Mayorga???? He won the fight by KNOCKOUT.

    And going by your two year BS that would mean that Shane has one of the most impressive wins over that period with his knockout of Margo and then Mayorga. Now name me 10 fighters that has done better in two years.

    It appears that you are really working hard to discredit Shane, I wonder what the motives are behind that??? *******??? Maybe????:huh
     
  14. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Hopkins is too high... p4p is what have you done for me latley

    Donaire is way to ****ing high... A win against 1 a class fighter, does not make you the 6th best boxer in the world


    If ward wins his next 2 fights, he should be somwhere in there
     
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Haye fans claim that Haye is P4P best. They claim that Haye is the best heavyweight in boxing history period.