Steiglitz v Sartison - not a unification fight

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, Mar 14, 2011.


  1. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    The WBA 168 belt cannot be on the line because the Andre Ward is the Super Champion.

    This is logical because you cannot have 2 Super Champions at the same weight, but what does it say about the bauble around Sartison's waist?
     
  2. eggboxer

    eggboxer Guest

    didnt stop gamboa unifiyin
    john super duper champ
    gamboa just plain old super champ
     
  3. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    yeh they will just make Ward regular champion.
     
  4. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    Exactly the same as featherweight, there will be 2 super champs.
     
  5. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    It's Sartison...
     
  6. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    Boxrec gives a maxmimum rating to this fight 5 stars
     
  7. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,132
    1,409
    Jul 20, 2004
    who cars about the WBA, there a complete joke
     
  8. That it's a joke title. Sartison had his chance to win the WBA Super Middleweight title when he fought Kessler in 2008. Kessler beat him. But the WBA invented another WBA Super Middleweight title for him even though Kessler was still champion and had not unified the title. How the **** can they justify that? The WBA want to con people out of money by saying that Sartison is a world champion. They think that we wont notice that Andre Ward holds the real WBA title. The WBA think that we are stupid.

    Don't start me off on the John/Gamboa Featherweight Super Unified debacle. Or lightweight for that matter. How many ****in WBA lightweight champions are we going to end up with?

    The WBA are an embarrassment to the sport of boxing.