Stephen A. Smith and Max Kellerman on Golovkins “Drug cheat” comment

SMH
“He’s the biggest star in boxing” So WHAT? He failed TWO, not one, TWO test. I like him but that was just stupid

 

Calling someone who failed two drug tests a drugs cheat? How dare he!

 

ESPN is the CNN of sports.

 

Who cares about belts it’s all about the $$$$$. Who brungs the dollars, GGG or Canelo?

 

pssh

 

ESPN is like MTV. MTV ruined music, then tv. now is mostly irrelevant. ESPN is a garbage channel with garbage employees.

 

He does have a point though, if it bothers Golovkin that much then he should pull out of the fight.

 

Smith be slurping that koolaid again.

 

Both are bringing the dollars. Both Canelo and GGG are superstars, both have a large fanbase and both are filling big venus with thousands of spectators. Saying Canelo is the only one who brings dollars to the table is simply BS.

GGG could easily fight BJS in front of 100.000 in the UK. Prob a much bigger fight than Canelo vs GGG...and this because GGG has the belts. Why should BJS fight Canelo?

 

Am surprised Lara and trout haven't had anything to say because to alot Thought they won them fights and he was probably cheating then to

 

Sure the both contribute but Canelo contributes more, much more.

No way is GGG BJS a bigger fight you are smoking that good stuff. Canelo GGG made 1.3 million PPVs at 70 bucks a pop. BJS GGG doesn't make half of that.

 

Pull out of the fight when he can make 10’s of millions and get the opportunity to bash the face in of the individual he now doesn’t like?

Pulling out sounds silly to me.

 

Waste of your life watching espn

 

Both of these clowns are insufferable.

 

He carried Floyd's water. Now, he's carrying Canelo's. He's the Water Boy. He doesn't know anything about boxing, is the worst commentator in boxing, should not have a job except I guess he's ESPNs basketball/football guy. He sides with whoever has the most money or fame because he doesn't know the sport. ESPN doesn't care about boxing. They had Teddy Atlas who was wrong as often as he was right but the guy lived and breathed boxing. His errors came from a place of stupidity instead of ignorance. He said some hard truths about the sport's corruption and they fired him. They have a good boxing print analyst over there in Dan Rafael but I guess he doesn't look telegenic, isn't a good enough speaker, or doesn't have the right representation to get him the job. I don't know why boxing commentary has always been this bad, but I'm guessing it's a lack of competition, since it's all the same faces for the last thirty years.