Steve Lillis:" Froch-Abraham likely to be on sky sports.

This would be brilliant, but a few fights too late in my opinion. There should have been interest shown from the very beginning.

 

Probably the best we can hope for in those fights is a delayed showing or highlights as an apertiser (sp) for Froch-Abraham. I can't see either being shown live by Sky.

 

That's because Sky took my advice:

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=239653&page=3

Post 39.

 

Fingers crossed. That'd be great news for Froch.

 

I think Rawlings was commentating because Ian Darke is away and other staff are not around. He did the McCloskey fight last year remember.

 

I'm sure this must be true, Mick shook on it

 

Christ!

 

Yes?

I'm here, what d'ya want?

 

Ask your Dad to chuck a lightning bolt into that miserable ****er.

 

No I didn't, read it again. I said "delayed showing", as you say "tape delay" is an Americanism. I just had a "lifes to short" moment about rowing about the difference and edited my post for a quiet life.

 

You struggle with basic reading don't you?

 

It will be good for Froch to get one of his big fights on sky at last so im pleased in a way.I am a bit pissed off though that they were not involved with super 6 from the start.Once again their subscribers were forced to pay out more money to watch their sport.Out of spite i may cancel my sky sports and watch the fight on RTL for free.I will do it for sure if as i expect them to they put Froch v Abraham on box office if its ppv my sky stays cancelled.

 

It will be great news if its on Sky, Froch deserves some publicity. I dont think the Kessler fight was controversial in any way but Id still sooner see American judges than Euro ones.