Ill be here to give G credit if he wins. Butvthis blind dick riding of a fighter thats fought no one at 31 years of age is getting ridiculously annoying. Let him actually beat someone good, then talk ****. Hes not great yet, hes not unbeatable. And yall sound like ***gots with that good boy ****. Let his nuts go.
I give Stevens, ehhhh, about the same chance that I give Rios and the other day I said "5%" in a thread asking odds of a Rios win over Pac.
How much credit should he get? Stevens is not a top 10 MW and his best win is over Saul Roman. He doesn't bring an undefeated record, minor title, great amateur pedigree, or anything at all to make this fight even seem like a big deal other than a couple nice highlight pieces that make people think he's a monstrous puncher. This fight means more than GGG's over Ishida. That is all I will say.
You say 31 like its old. He hasn't been in any wars yet, he is healthy. He has about 5-6 years of prime left which is plenty of time. kid chocolate is 30, martinez is 39, darren barker is 31, andre ward is 29, froch is 36....
Exactly !! I don't think Stevens can deal with GGG skill wise but he sure as hell is on par with him as far power and strength goes. We will see what happens when GGG is in a fight where he may NOT be the stronger puncher, or the stronger fighter, how will he deal .
Unless you're a HW, GGG will always be the stronger fighter. There are rumors that he backed up wladmir in sparring. He's 5'10 walks around at 170...
Now I know your ****ing tripping !!! No one fighter is the strongest, the fastest , or the hardest puncher. To think this ways is just plain STUPID !!! GGG is human not a god, he will eventually face someone who is stronger, faster then himself, how will he deal ? Thats whats boxing is all about, to win when your not always the strongest. You guys are getting ridicules with the nut sucking.
That's 65/35 fight in favor of GGG, stevens is better than most of you think and Golovkin it's not that hard to hit