Stevenson loses The Ring belt

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Maxime, Nov 24, 2015.


  1. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,100
    36,899
    Apr 17, 2011
    No, but according to the Ring, they can make the winner of his upcoming rematch with Pascal the champion.
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,171
    27,891
    Jan 18, 2010
    No he isn't.
    First Ring isn't always lineal, and second it's vacant.
    Kova is the #1, and pimp the #2, so they'd have to fight eachother for it. (or #1 and #3)
     
  3. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Beterbiev and Haymon Parters are about to steal every single belt without having to fight Ward or Kovalev.
     
  4. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Stevenson is the lineal champ @ 175 until he loses at the weight, moves up or retires...
     
  5. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    Transitional rankings, and IWBR (computer based) are the only ones I really trust ATM.

    This content is protected
     
  6. The Smoking Man

    The Smoking Man Boxing Addict banned

    4,736
    4
    Jul 24, 2015
    Signing with haymon male you fall out of favour with the ring. Eg Stevenson, frampton suddenly dropping below quigg when he signed with haymon
     
  7. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    Oh the days when Ring was $3.50 and a reputable source.

    This content is protected
     
  8. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    :patsch


    Of course. This is correct.

    BUT! being that Hopkins is 3 and Pascal is 4.......what are the odds they move Pascal up in the mean?:think
     
  9. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    347
    May 6, 2013
    Well, not according to the Ring.
     
  10. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    They don't even have to move Pascal up per the stupid rules they instituted a few years ago. Boy that sure makes this dumb rematch enticing now though!
    The Ring belt has no bearing on who is or is not the lineal champion.
     
  11. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    347
    May 6, 2013
    Then how do you determine the top 2 contenders when lineal championships is vacant?

    #1 vs #2 by Ring?

    :smoke
     
  12. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Well it could be #1 vs #4 according to The Ring's own skewed policies as well. Hell they put their belt on the line for Mayweather-Guerrero. Surely you don't think that fight should have created a lineage, right?

    The TBRB rankings are the only ones trustworthy and also their champions are far more likely to conform to consensus lineal champions.
     
  13. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    The idea of a lineal champion is a very uncertain practice.
     
  14. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    The Ring is no different than any other sanctioning organization - ie not to be taken seriously...
     
  15. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    The problem with lineage is when it becomes vacant. A boxer retires or moves division. Rarely will the world agree who was 2nd and 3rd. Hence it gets skewed.
    www.premierboxingorganisation.com