Still not getting over Pac-JMM III

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012.


Page 12 of 13
  1. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    :blood

    Another fool just appeared.. THis would be fun.. :yep

    So you don't agree with the OP, I'd like to hear your thoughts.. :smoke

    Oh wait, the name itself suggests that you are a certified *****..

    YOU FEED ON FLOYD'S **** :lol: :lol:


    Let's see what you got, say something true about Pac-JMM III..

    I doubt you would come up with a rational, balanced, sensible, and reasonable valid point.. :deal Say something relevant, you delirious *****.. :smoke
     
    LordJomski, May 25, 2012
    LordJomski, May 25, 2012
    #166
  2. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
    I Had Marquez ahead by 2 rounds.
     
    cpnasty, May 26, 2012
    cpnasty, May 26, 2012
    #167
  3. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    Why do Floyd fans always talk about Pac JMM III
    This content is protected
    it was
    This content is protected
    ? :rofl

    As if, it was Floyd fighting Pac and not JMM. :rofl

    As if, Floyd COULD'VE done that too. :rofl

    As if, Floyd has the courage to even step in the ring with Pac. :rofl
     
    tinorknitz, May 26, 2012
    tinorknitz, May 26, 2012
    #168
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    It does'nt matter how the fight will play out.
    The judges know who they're going to score for going in.
    Bradley needs a KO to get a draw plain and simple.
     
    divac, May 26, 2012
    divac, May 26, 2012
    #169
  5. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    Man, its shocking to see that there are still a few people out there that think Pacquiao won....
     
    Kingkazim, May 26, 2012
    Kingkazim, May 26, 2012
    #170
  6. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    Going in a fight with a mindset that you can't win it by decision and not having the capabilities to KO your opponent who is the most relentless boxer of welterweight division today.. How do you think Bradley feels? :think

    Its unfair to say that Pac will win by decision even if he loses that fight.. Pac won all his fights clean.. Erik Morales defeated him by a UD.. And that time they are building Pac's name so why would they let him lose?

    In the first place, JMM got lucky when he escaped by a draw.. And now when Pac beats him in a close fight, you call it robbery? :patsch

    You just can't call it right.. :bart
     
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    #171
  7. dsr

    dsr Active Member Full Member

    962
    0
    Jul 10, 2011
    There were very close rounds and the decision can go either way no? It's not that complicated really
     
    dsr, May 27, 2012
    dsr, May 27, 2012
    #172
  8. Spearmint Rhino

    Spearmint Rhino Guest

    There weren't many close rounds though, were there?

    Marquez handled Pacquiao the way an experienced veteran teaches a young, enthusiastic sparring partner a bit of a lesson.

    Anything from 10-2 to Marquez and 7-5 to Marquez is justifiable.

    Anyone scoring it to Pac is either biased or blind.
     
    Spearmint Rhino, May 27, 2012
    Spearmint Rhino, May 27, 2012
    #173
  9. Convicted_Felon

    Convicted_Felon Certified Savage Full Member

    678
    0
    Oct 3, 2011
    I'm not one of the many who will claim that Marquez got robbed. I will say that Marquez certainly landed some heavy shots but he didn't score for effective aggression. He wasn't the aggressor throughout the fight and that's why he didn't get his hand raised. I have been one to say that Pacquiao's p4p will be tested and questioned once he set foot in the ring with someone who had boxing skill. Marquez made Manny look like an amateur fighter at times. Manny's trainer said his last 3 fights were not so good. If he was training another fighter, he would say it was time to go after Pacquiao. That was the formula for every fighter except for the Marquez fight. Fighters who've had 2 bad outings in a row are De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Margarito, and Mosley. Fighters who were knocked out were Hatton, Cotto, and Margarito. Roach's doctrine is to catch fighters when they are at a career low and exploit them. What goes around comes around and it may be Pac's turn to be on the receiving end of what he dished out.
     
    Convicted_Felon, May 27, 2012
    Convicted_Felon, May 27, 2012
    #174
  10. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    It seems like you were not reading the whole thread.. :think

    May we hear your category of judging why a boxer wins a round? And an explanation of each? :smoke
     
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    #175
  11. bodyheadic

    bodyheadic Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,597
    0
    May 11, 2012
    Marquez won this fight handily. It wasn't voted robbery of the year for no reason.
     
    bodyheadic, May 27, 2012
    bodyheadic, May 27, 2012
    #176
  12. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    See post #155 and add there something I missed.. :smoke

    I don't think I missed something.. :think
     
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    LordJomski, May 27, 2012
    #177
  13. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    :bump
     
    LordJomski, May 28, 2012
    LordJomski, May 28, 2012
    #178
  14. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    why do you keep bumping this up? it's a solid opinion by almost everybody, pac lost. move on *******.
     
    randy brown, May 28, 2012
    randy brown, May 28, 2012
    #179
  15. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    As long as the issue remains, this is the thread to discuss it.. :deal
     
    LordJomski, May 28, 2012
    LordJomski, May 28, 2012
    #180
Page 12 of 13